首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Matched-Pair Analysis of Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Satisfaction and Perioperative Pain Management in 846 Cases
【24h】

Matched-Pair Analysis of Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Satisfaction and Perioperative Pain Management in 846 Cases

机译:总膝关节置换术局部浸润镇痛的匹配对分析:846例患者满意度和围手术期疼痛管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the recent past, numerous studies evaluating local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with controversial results have been reported. Efforts have been made to improve patients' outcome regarding operation techniques and material, as well as pain management and anesthetic methods. In this study, postoperative pain management and patient satisfaction were evaluated in patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery with or without intraoperative LIA. Within the context of the "Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management" (QUIPS) project, parameters were collected on the first postoperative day. All patients included in this study underwent primary knee replacement surgery with general anesthesia. Parameters were compared after performing a 1:1 matched-pair analysis within 14 orthopaedic departments. Pain levels and pain management satisfaction were measured using the numerous rating scales, and pain medication use was compared. From 2010 to 2015, 2,789 patients who underwent primary knee arthroplasty with general anesthesia were evaluated within the project, of whom a total of 846 patients could be compared after performing a matched-pair analysis. Pain scores were significantly better in the LIA group ( p = 0.019 for activity pain, p = 0.043 for maximum pain, p < 0.001 for minimum pain), but pain management satisfaction was not superior ( p = 0.083). Patients with LIA required less opioids in the recovery room ( p = 0.048), while nonopioid medication did not differ significantly ( p = 0.603). At the ward, 24 hours postoperatively, no significant difference in the use for nonopioids ( p = 0.789) could be measured, whereas patients in the LIA group received significantly more opioids ( p < 0.001). Although LIA achieved improvement in pain score outcome, and a comparable patient satisfaction level in the immediate postoperative course, the use of LIA in knee arthroplasty, controversially discussed in the current literature, was not able to reduce the need for opioid pain medication in this study.
机译:据报道,在最近的过去,已经报道了许多研究局部渗透镇痛(LIA)的研究已经报道了有争议的结果。已经努力改善了患者的经营技术和材料的结果,以及疼痛管理和麻醉方法。在这项研究中,在进行膝关节置换手术的患者中,术后疼痛管理和患者满意度,或没有术中LIA。在“术后疼痛管理”(Quips)项目的质量改进的背景下,在术后第一天收集参数。本研究中包含的所有患者都接受了初级膝关节置换手术与全身麻醉。在在14个矫形部门内执行1:1匹配对分析后比较参数。使用众多评级尺度测量疼痛水平和疼痛管理满意度,比较止痛药。从2010年到2015年,在项目中评估了2,789名接受初级膝关节置换术的患者,在该项目中,在进行匹配对分析后,可以在共有846名患者中进行846名患者。 LIA组疼痛评分显着更好(活性疼痛,P = 0.043,用于最大疼痛,最小疼痛P <0.001),但疼痛管理满意度不优化(P = 0.083)。患有LIA的患者在恢复室中需要较少的阿片类药物(P = 0.048),而非磷皮药物未显着差异(P = 0.603)。在病房,术后24小时,可以测量对非磷酸的用途没有显着差异(P = 0.789),而LIA组的患者接受显着更多的阿片类药物(P <0.001)。虽然Lia在术后术后疼痛评分结果中取得了改善,但在术后术后的患者满意度水平,LIA在膝关节置换术中的使用,在目前的文献中有争议地讨论,在本研究中无法减少对阿片类药物疼痛药物的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号