首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology: Official Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology >Individual‐Specific QT Interval Correction for Drugs With Substantial Heart Rate Effect Using Holter ECGs Extracted Over a Wide Range of Heart Rates
【24h】

Individual‐Specific QT Interval Correction for Drugs With Substantial Heart Rate Effect Using Holter ECGs Extracted Over a Wide Range of Heart Rates

机译:使用Helter ECG在广泛的心率下提取的HOLTER ECGS具有大量心率效应的药物的个人特异性QT间隔校正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Although fixed QT correction methods are typically used to adjust for the effect of heart rate on the QT interval in thorough QT/QTc studies, individual‐specific QT correction (QTcI = QT/RR I ) is advisable for drugs that increase the heart rate by 5 to 10 beats/minute (bpm). QTcI is traditionally derived using resting drug‐free electrocardiograms (ECGs) collected at prespecified times. However, the resting heart rate range in healthy individuals is narrow, and extrapolation of inferences from these data to higher heart rates could be inappropriate. Accordingly, the QTcI derived from triplicate ECGs extracted at prespecified times (the traditional [T] method, yielding QTcIT) was compared with QTcIs obtained using ECGs with a wider heart rate range (alternative Holter [H] method, yielding QTcIH) from 24‐hour Holter recordings from 40 healthy individuals selected from a central ECG laboratory database. For QTcIH, 10‐second ECGs were extracted at stable heart rates in the ranges of 51‐60, 61‐70, 71‐80, and 81‐90 bpm (9 ECGs in each bin = 36 ECGs). An independent set of 40 ECGs with heart rates from 51 to 90 bpm was extracted from each individual to validate the accuracy of QTcI by the 2 methods. For the validation set, the QTcIH was a better QT correction method (slope of QTc vs heart rate closer to zero) than QTcIT. The mean difference between QTcIT and QTcIH increased from 3.1 milliseconds at 65 bpm to 10.0 milliseconds at 90 bpm ( P 0.01). The QTcIT exceeded QTcIH at heart rates 60 bpm. Employment of the QTcIH may be more appropriate for studies involving drugs that increase heart rate.
机译:摘要虽然固定QT校正方法通常用于调整心率对QT间隔的效果,但是,个体特定的QT校正(QTCI = QT / RR I)是建议增加心率的药物BY& 5到10次/分钟(BPM)。 QTCI传统上使用静止的无毒的无药丸电气图(ECG)来源于预先预先收集的时间。然而,健康个体的静息心率范围是狭窄的,从这些数据推断到更高的心率可能是不合适的。因此,与在预先确定的时间(传统的[T]方法中提取的三份ECG衍生的QTCI与使用ECGS获得的QTCIS进行比较,使用更宽的心率范围(替代的HOLTER [H]方法,从24-从中央ECG实验室数据库中选择的40个健康个体的小时录音。对于QTCIH,在51-60,61-70,71-80和81-90bpm的范围内以稳定的心率提取10秒的心电图(每个箱子中的9个ECG = 36个ECG)。从每个人提取一个具有51至90bpm的心率的40个ECG的独立集40个ECG,以通过2种方法验证QTCI的准确性。对于验证集,QTCIH是比QTCIT更好的QT校正方法(QTC VS心率比零的斜率更接近零)。 QTCIT和QTCIH之间的平均差异从35bpm的3.1毫秒增加到90 bpm的10.0毫秒(P <0.01)。 QTCIT超过了心脏速率的QTCIH& 60 bpm。 QTCIH的就业可能更适合涉及增加心率的药物的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号