首页> 外文期刊>The Hastings Center report >Hans Jonas and the Ethics of Human Subjects Research
【24h】

Hans Jonas and the Ethics of Human Subjects Research

机译:Hans Jonas和人类受试者的伦理研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract In the 1960s, human experimentation and public funding of research increased significantly, and with the rise of the modern teaching hospital, the distinction between clinical care and experimentation became more and more blurred. Yet little in the way of meaningful government regulation existed in the United States prior to 1970. In 1966, Paul Freund, the president of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, appointed an interdisciplinary working group to consult on the issues being raised by human experimentation. Contributions from the group were published in a 1969 issue of Daedalus titled Ethical Aspects of Experimentation with Human Subjects. In the lead essay, Hans Jonas challenged then‐conventional understandings of the moral problems posed by research involving humans and argued for an alternative moral framework. To Jonas, it mattered whether the physician was trying to make the patient well rather than trying to find out how to improve the health of future patients .
机译:摘要在20世纪60年代,人类的实验和研究公共资金显着增加,随着现代教学医院的崛起,临床护理与实验之间的区别变得越来越模糊。然而,在1970年之前的美国存在有意义的政府监管方面几乎没有。1966年,美国艺术和科学院主席保罗弗德被任命为跨学科工作组,咨询人类实验所提出的问题。本集团的捐款于1969年发布于1969年的DaedaLus标题为人类受试者的伦理方面。在引导篇文章中,汉斯乔纳斯挑战了对涉及人类的研究所带来的道德问题的传统理解,并争论替代道德框架。对于乔纳斯来说,医生是否试图使病人能够好好,而不是试图了解如何改善未来患者的健康状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号