首页> 外文期刊>The journal of alternative and complementary medicine: research on paradigm, practice, and policy >Brief Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Acute and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Brief Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Acute and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

机译:基于简短的急性和慢性疼痛的干预措施:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: Nonpharmacologic approaches have been characterized as the preferred means to treat chronic noncancer pain by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There is evidence that mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are effective for pain management, yet the typical MBI may not be feasible across many clinical settings due to resource and time constraints. Brief MBIs (BMBIs) could prove to be more feasible and pragmatic for safe treatment of pain. The aim of the present article is to systematically review evidence of BMBI's effects on acute and chronic pain outcomes in humans. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar and by examining the references of retrieved articles. Articles written in English, published up to August 16, 2017, and reporting on the effects of a BMBI (i.e., total contact time <1.5 h, with mindfulness as the primary therapeutic technique) on a pain-related outcome (i.e., pain outcome, pain affect, pain-related function/quality of life, or medication-related outcome) were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed risk of bias. Results: Twenty studies meeting eligibility criteria were identified. Studies used qualitative (n = 1), within-group (n = 3), or randomized controlled trial (n = 16) designs and were conducted with clinical (n = 6) or nonclinical (i.e., experimentally-induced pain; n = 14) samples. Of the 25 BMBIs tested across the 20 studies, 13 were delivered with audio/video recording only, and 12 were delivered by a provider (participant-provider contact ranged from 3 to 80 min). Existing evidence was limited and inconclusive overall. Nevertheless, BMBIs delivered in a particular format-by a provider and lasting more than 5 min-showed some promise in the management of acute pain. Conclusions: More rigorous large scale studies conducted with pain populations are needed before unequivocally recommending BMBI as a first-line treatment for acute or chronic pain.
机译:目的:非武装方法的特征是治疗疾病控制和预防中心治疗慢性非癌症疼痛的首选手段。有证据表明,谨慎的干预措施(MBIS)对疼痛管理有效,但由于资源和时间限制,许多临床环境中的典型MBI可能不可行。简要介绍MBIS(BMBIS)可以证明是对安全治疗疼痛的更可行和务实。本文的目的是系统地审查BMBI对人类急性和慢性疼痛结果的影响。方法:使用PubMed,Psycinfo和Google Scholar进行文献搜索,并通过检查检索到的文章的参考。用英语编写的文章,高达2017年8月16日,并报告了BMBI的影响(即总接触时间<1.5小时,正常作为主要治疗技术)对疼痛相关的结果(即疼痛结果,疼痛影响,与疼痛相关的功能/生活质量,或相关的药物相关结果)有资格包含。两位作者独立提取数据并评估偏见的风险。结果:确定了会议资格标准的二十研究。研究使用定性(n = 1),组内(n = 3)或随机对照试验(n = 16)设计,并用临床(n = 6)或非临床(即,实验诱导的疼痛; n = 14)样品。在20项研究中测试的25个BMBIS中,13个仅用音频/视频录制提供,提供者提供12个(参与者 - 提供者接触范围为3至80分钟)。现有的证据是有限的,整体无论何方载都要彻底。然而,BMBIS以特定的格式交付给提供商,持续超过5分钟 - 在急性疼痛的管理中显示了一些承诺。结论:在明确地推荐BMBI作为急性或慢性疼痛的一线治疗之前,需要用疼痛群进行更严格的大规模研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号