...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Problematising LGBTIQ drug use, governing sexuality and gender: A critical analysis of LGBTIQ health policy in Australia
【24h】

Problematising LGBTIQ drug use, governing sexuality and gender: A critical analysis of LGBTIQ health policy in Australia

机译:LGBTIQ药物使用有问题,治理性和性别:澳大利亚LGBTIQ健康政策的批判性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is well-established that a high prevalence of substance use is found in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) populations; a finding that researchers attribute to the stigmatised status of non normative sexual and gender expression, and the role of illicit drug use in the collective production of sociosexual pleasures, expressivity and disclosure in LGBTIQ communities. Despite the connections between sexual experimentation and substance use, LGBTIQ consumption practices have rarely received the attention they deserve within the alcohol and other drug (AOD) field. In this paper, we draw on concepts from post-structuralist policy analysis to analyse how AOD consumption among sexual and gender minorities is constituted in the policies of three Australian LGBTIQ health organisations. Following Carol Bacchi's (2009, p. xi) observation that we are "governed through problematisations rather than policies", we consider how substance use in LGBTIQ populations has been formulated as a policy problem requiring intervention. Doing so allows us to identify the normative assumptions about minority sexual and gender identities that underpin dominant problematisations of LGBTIQ substance use. These include: a) high rates of AOD use in LGBTIQ populations constitute problems in and of themselves, regardless of individual patterns of use; b) LGBTIQ people are a vulnerable population with specialised needs; and c) sexualised drug use is associated with "disinhibition" and a range of risks (including HIV transmission, drug dependence and mental health issues). Addressing the implications of these assumptions for how LGBTIQ communities are governed, we suggest that problematisation is an embodied, situated process, and that there is much to be gained by reframing dominant problematisations of AOD consumption so that this process is better informed by the inventive practices of LGBTIQ consumers themselves.
机译:众所周知,在女同性恋,同性恋,双性恋,跨性别,intersex和酷儿(LGBTIQ)群体中发现了高度的物质使用患病率;一个发现研究人员归因于非规范性性和性别表达的耻辱状况,以及非法药物用途在LGBTIQ社区的社会愉快,表达和披露中的集体生产中的作用。尽管有性化实验和物质使用之间的联系,但LGBTIQ消费实践很少受到它们在酒精和其他药物(AOD)领域的关注。在本文中,我们利用后结构主义政策分析的概念,分析了如何在三个澳大利亚LGBTIQ卫生组织的政策中构成的性别和性别少数群体之间的消费量。在Carol Bacchi(2009,P. Xi)观察到,我们“通过问题而不是政策管理”,我们考虑如何将LGBTIQ人群中的物质用作需要干预的政策问题。这样做允许我们识别关于少数民族性和性别身份的规范性假设,这是利用LGBTIQ物质的主要问题。这些包括:a)无论个人使用模式如何,LGBTIQ人群中的AOD使用高率都构成了自己的问题; b)LGBTIQ人是一个拥有专门需求的脆弱人口; c)性化药物使用与“禁止”和一系列风险(包括艾滋病毒传播,药物依赖和心理健康问题有关。解决这些假设对LGBTIQ社区的影响的影响,我们建议有问题是一个体现的,所在的过程,并且通过抑制AOD消费的主导问题来实现很多很大程度上,因此本发明的实践更好地了解了这一过程LGBTIQ消费者自己。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号