首页> 外文期刊>The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences >Impact of climate-smart agricultural practices on growth and crop yields of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains
【24h】

Impact of climate-smart agricultural practices on growth and crop yields of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains

机译:气候智能农业实践对西北西北部稻米(Oryza Sativa)-Whee(Triticum Aestivum)系统生长和作物产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production systems are the major contributor to national food security, which became unsustainable with passing of time due to inappropriate management and use of natural resources, inputs and technologies and is further aggravate with climate change induced risks. And if the business as usual in production approaches may not be able to cope up with the projected climate changes effects. Therefore, a multi-location farmer's participatory strategic research was conducted to evaluate the effects of layering of key technologies, practices and services in varied combinations and compared with business as usual (farmer's practice) for sustainability of rice and wheat productivity. In our present study, six scenarios: Fanner's practice (FP); Improved FP (IFP) with low intensity of adaptive measures; IFP with high intensity of adaptive measures (IFP-AM); Climatesmart agriculture (CSA) with low intensity of adaptive measures (CSA-L); CSA with medium intensity of adaptive measures (CSA-M); CSA with high intensity of adaptive measures (CSA-H) were compared. The results revealed that CSAPs (CSA-L, CSA-M, and CSA-H) recorded higher plant height, panicles per sq m and biomass accumulation but lesser grains per panicle and 1000-grain weight compared to FP (transplanted rice; TPR). Rice yield was not much influenced under different management scenarios. The unfilled grains per panicle under IFP-AM, CSA-L, CSA-M, and CSA-H were 17, 18, 15 and 14% higher compared to FR. Growth and yield parameters of wheat were recorded higher under CSAPs during all the years. Three years mean, CSA-H, CSA-M and CSA-L recorded 16,14 and 11% higher grain yield compared to that of FP (5.06 q/ha), respectively. Improved fanner's practices (mean of IFP and IFP-AM) recorded 4% higher yield over FP in all the years. Intensive tillage-based scenarios (FP) showed water stagnation for long period (6 days) due to untimely rainfall (on 2 March 2015 with the amount 98.8 mm) which ultimately turned into lower grain yield but such factors did not influence grain yield under CSAPs. Therefore, our study results suggest that CSA practices should be promoted in dominated RW production region for increasing productivity and climate change mitigation.
机译:米饭(Oryza sativa l。) - 小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)生产系统是国家粮食安全的主要贡献者,由于不适当的管理和使用自然资源,投入和技术,并且进一步加剧,随着时间的推移而变得不可持续。进一步加剧随着气候变化的诱发风险。如果在生产方法中常用的业务可能无法应对预计的气候变化影响。因此,进行了多个地理农民的参与性战略研究,以评估各种组合的关键技术,实践和服务分层的影响,以及与常规(农民实践)的业务相比,米和小麦生产力的可持续性。在我们现在的研究中,六种情景:粉丝的练习(FP);改进的FP(IFP)具有低强度的自适应措施;具有高强度的自适应措施(IFP-AM)的IFP;气候系统(CSA)具有低强度的自适应措施(CSA-L); CSA具有中等强度的自适应措施(CSA-M);比较了具有高强度的自适应措施(CSA-H)的CSA。结果表明,CSAP(CSA-L,CSA-M和CSA-H)记录了较高的植物高度,每平方米和生物质积聚,但与FP(移植稻米)相比,每穗和1000粒重量较小的谷物和1000粒重量。在不同的管理情景下,水稻产量并不多。与FR相比,IFP-AM,CSA-1,CSA-M和CSA-H下未填充的每穗粒为17,18,15%和14%。在整个年份,小麦的生长和产量参数在CSAP下记录更高。与FP(5.06 Q / HA)相比,三年平均值,CSA-H,CSA-M和CSA-L恢复16,14和11%的谷物产量。改进的粉丝仪的实践(IFP和IFP-AM的平均值)在整个年内均在FP中记录了4%的产量。基于耕种的情景(FP)由于降雨(2015年3月2日,98.8毫米的金额为98.8毫米,最终导致粮食产量,但这些因素在CSAP下的粮食产量下降而导致的长期(6天)显示出水停滞不前(6天)。 。因此,我们的研究结果表明,应在主导的RW生产区域促进CSA实践,以提高生产力和气候变化缓解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号