首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >GPs' perceptions of advance care planning with frail and older people: a qualitative study
【24h】

GPs' perceptions of advance care planning with frail and older people: a qualitative study

机译:GPS'对Frail和老年人的预付款规划的看法:一个定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background & para;& para;Frail and older people are estimated to account for 40% of deaths. Despite conversations about end-of-life care being an important component of the national End of Life Care Strategy, there is a marked disparity between the majority who would like to discuss advance care plans, and the minority who currently have this opportunity.& para;& para;Aim & para;& para;To investigate the attitudes of GPs to advance care planning (ACP) discussions with frail and older individuals.& para;& para;Design and setting & para;& para;Focus group study with GPs in Cambridgeshire between September 2015 and January 2016.& para;& para;Method & para;& para;Five focus groups with 21 GPs were purposively sampled to maximise diversity. Framework analysis was used to analyse transcripts and develop themes.& para;& para;Results:& para;& para;Although some GPs were concerned it might cause distress, the majority felt that raising ACP was important, especially as preparation for future emergencies. Knowing the individuals, introducing the idea as part of ongoing discussions, and public awareness campaigns were all facilitators identified. Several considered that service limitations made it difficult to fulfil patients' wishes and risked raising unrealistic patient expectations. Other barriers identified included uncertainty over prognosis and difficulties ensuring that individuals' wishes were respected.& para;& para;Conclusion & para;& para;Most GPs viewed ACP as important. However, their enthusiasm was tempered by experience. This study highlights the difficulties for GPs of encouraging dialogue and respecting individuals' wishes within the constraints of the existing health and social care system. National publicity campaigns and encouraging patients to prioritise healthcare outcomes could help GPs raise care preferences without causing a detrimental impact on patients or raising unrealistic expectations. Once patients agree their care preferences, they need to be documented, accessible, and reviewed by all relevant health and social care providers to ensure that their wishes are respected, and plans amended as their circumstances change.
机译:背景与段;&段;虚弱和老年人估计为40%的死亡。尽管对生活结束护理的谈话是国家生命保健战略的重要组成部分,但大多数人希望讨论推进护理计划的明显差异,以及目前拥有这个机会的少数民族。&律师;¶ AIM¶¶调查GPS推进护理计划(ACP)讨论的态度和老年人。¶¶设计和设置和段落;¶焦点小组学习2015年9月和2016年1月之间的剑桥的GPS。&Para;&Para;方法¶&段;五个焦点小组,有21个GPS的五个焦点群体被用作最大化多样性。框架分析用于分析成绩单和发展主题。¶&段;结果:¶¶虽然一些GPS担心它可能会造成痛苦,但大多数人认为筹集ACP是重要的,特别是作为未来紧急情况的准备。了解个人,将这个想法作为持续讨论的一部分引入,以及公众意识活动是确定的所有促进者。几次认为,服务限制使得难以满足患者的愿望,并冒险提高不切实际的患者期望。确定的其他障碍包括不确定的预后和困难,确保个人的愿望受到尊重。&段;&段;结论和段落;&段;¶大多数GPS都认为ACP是重要的。然而,他们的热情受到了经验的影响。本研究突出了令人鼓舞的对话和尊重个人在现有卫生和社会护理制度的制约范围内的难题的困难。国家宣传活动和令人鼓舞的患者优先考虑医疗保健结果可以帮助GPS提出护理偏好,而不会对患者产生有害影响或提高不切实际的期望。一旦患者同意他们的护理偏好,他们需要被所有相关的健康和社会护理提供者记录,可访问和审查,并审查他们的愿望,并在其情况变动时修改计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号