首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >Outcomes After Predischarge Initiation of β-Blocker in Patients Hospitalized for Severe Decompensated Heart Failure Requiring Inotropic Therapy
【24h】

Outcomes After Predischarge Initiation of β-Blocker in Patients Hospitalized for Severe Decompensated Heart Failure Requiring Inotropic Therapy

机译:在住院治疗患者患者β-ression的β-ression患者中的β-ressed患者需要进行调节性心力衰竭的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundThe optimal time for initiating β-blocker (BB) treatment in patients with severe acute decompensated heart failure requiring inotropic therapy has not been well defined. We evaluated the effect of predischarge initiation of BB treatment on clinical outcomes. MethodsAmong the 5625 patients enrolled in the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry, 672 BB-naive patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (median, 67.0 years; 62.5% male; median left ventricular ejection fraction, 24.1%) who received inotropic support during hospitalization were evaluated. We compared the risk of post-discharge mortality and rehospitalization between groups with (n?= 282) and without (n?= 390) pre-discharge BB treatment. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 2.6 years, all-cause mortality occurred in 252 patients (37.5%). Those who received pre-discharge BB treatment showed lower 2-year mortality rates compared with those who did not (21.3% vs 39.3%;P< 0.001). In a Cox proportional hazards model, all-cause mortality was consistently lower in pre-discharge BB groups after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.95;P?= 0.025) and adjustment for propensity score methods using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.93;P?= 0.016). The same trend was observed for secondary outcomes of rehospitalization for any cause and rehospitalization for heart failure. Pre-discharge BB was associated with higher rates of BB prescription after 6 (90.1% vs 23.9%;P< 0.001) and 12 (88.9% vs 25.0%;P< 0.001) months. ConclusionsPre-discharge BB initiation is associated with better clinical outcomes after severe acute decompensated heart failure episodes requiring inotropic therapy.
机译:背景技术在需要各渗透治疗的严重急性失效的心力衰竭患者中启动β-嵌体(BB)治疗的最佳时间尚未明确。我们评估了预防BB治疗对临床结果的影响。 MethodyMong AMG 5625患者参加了韩国急性心力衰竭(Korahf)登记处,672名BB-NAIVIVE患者患有心力衰竭的射血分数减少(中位数,67.0岁; 62.5%雄性;中位左心室射血分数,24.1%)谁收到评估住院期间的渗透性载体。我们比较了出院后死亡率的风险,并在群体之间进行了(n?= 282),没有(n?= 390)预放电bb治疗。取出22岁的中位随访2.6岁,252名患者发生了所有原因死亡率(37.5%)。那些接受预排出BB治疗的人表现出2年的死亡率较低,与那些没有(21.3%Vs 39.3%; P <0.001)。在Cox比例危险模型中,多变量调节后预放电BB组(危险比0.69; 95%置信区间,0.50-0.95;p≤0.025)和使用治疗加权的反概率(危险比,0.70; 95%置信区间,0.52-0.93; p?= 0.016)。对于心力衰竭的任何原因和再生长的再次结果,观察到相同的趋势。预放电BB与6后的BB处方率较高(90.1%Vs 23.9%; P <0.001)和12(88.9%vs 25.0%; P <0.001)个月。结论在需要透镜治疗的严重急性失代偿心力衰竭发作后,结论分析 - 放电BB引发与更好的临床结果有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号