...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >Retrospective analysis of first-line anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment patterns in wet age-related macular degeneration
【24h】

Retrospective analysis of first-line anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment patterns in wet age-related macular degeneration

机译:湿性老年性黄斑变性一线抗血管内皮生长因子治疗模式的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: This study compared the number of, and expenditures on, first-line intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections between patients who were treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study based on U.S. administrative claims data. Selected patients had initiated first-line intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment with ranibizumab or aflibercept (index date) between November 18, 2011 and April 30, 2013, were aged ≥18 years on the index date, had 12 months of continuous insurance enrollment prior to the index date (baseline period), were diagnosed with wet AMD during the baseline period or on the index date, and had at least 6 or 12 months of follow-up enrollment after the index date without switching to a different anti-VEGF agent (follow-up periods). Outcomes measured within the 6 and 12 month follow-up periods included the number of, and healthcare expenditures on, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Multivariable regressions compared the outcomes between aflibercept and ranibizumab. Results: The 6 months analyses included 319 aflibercept patients and 1,054 ranibizumab patients (12 month analyses: 57 and 374, respectively). Over the first 6 months after the index date, neither the number of injections (aflibercept mean = 3.8 ± 1.6; ranibizumab mean = 3.9 ± 1.9) nor the expenditures on injections (aflibercept mean = $7 468 ± $4 211; ranibizumab mean = $7 816 ± $4 834) differed significantly between aflibercept patients and ranibizumab patients (in multivariable regression treating ranibizumab as reference: incidence rate ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.03, P = 0.277; cost ratio = 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.04, P = 0.338). Differences were also insignificant in the 12 month analyses. The overall mean days between injections differed by only 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.3) days between the aflibercept patients and ranibizumab patients (42.4 and 40.6, respectively). Conclusion: Aflibercept and ranibizumab were used at a similar frequency resulting in similar intravitreal anti-VEGF injection healthcare expenditures among wet AMD patients initiating first-line intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.
机译:简介:这项研究比较了接受aflibercept或ranibizumab治疗的湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者之间一线玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)注射的次数和支出。方法:这是一项基于美国行政要求数据的回顾性队列研究。选定的患者在2011年11月18日至2013年4月30日期间开始使用兰尼单抗或aflibercept进行一线玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗(索引日期),在索引日期年龄≥18岁,并在此之前已连续12个月参加保险指标日期(基线期),在基线期或指标日期被诊断出患有湿性AMD,并且在指标日期之后至少有6或12个月的随访入组,而未使用其他抗VEGF药物(随访期)。在6个月和12个月的随访期内测得的结果包括玻璃体内抗VEGF注射的数量和医疗保健支出。多变量回归比较了阿柏西普和兰尼单抗之间的结果。结果:6个月的分析包括319例abribercept患者和1,054例兰尼单抗患者(12个月分析分别为57和374)。在索引日期后的前6个月中,注射次数(阿非西普均值= 3.8±1.6;兰尼单抗均值= 3.9±1.9)或注射支出(阿非西普均值= $ 7,468±$ 4,211;兰尼单抗均值= $ 7,816) abribercept患者和兰尼单抗患者之间的差异为±4 834美元(在以兰尼单抗为参考的多变量回归分析中,发生率比= 0.97,95%置信区间[CI] 0.91-1.03,P = 0.277;成本比= 0.96,95%CI) 0.89-1.04,P = 0.338)。在12个月的分析中差异也很小。在aflibercept患者和兰尼单抗患者之间,注射之间的总平均天数仅相差1.8天(95%CI 1.3-2.3)(分别为42.4和40.6)。结论:Aflibercept和ranibizumab的使用频率相似,导致开始一线玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗的湿性AMD患者在玻璃体内注射抗VEGF的医疗保健支出相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号