首页> 外文期刊>The Clinical neuropsychologist >Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests
【24h】

Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests

机译:认知障碍不会造成无效性能:在六个性能有效性测试中分析认知未受损失,障碍和非可供参与者之间的性能模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Performance validity tests (PVTs) are essential in neuropsychological evaluations; however, it has been questioned how PVTs function in the context of cognitive impairment, and whether cognitive impairment alone is sufficient to cause PVT failure. Further, there is concern that some clinicians will disregard failed PVTs due to their perception that failures represent false-positive errors secondary to cognitive impairment. This study examined patterns associated with cognitively impaired versus noncredible performance across a battery of PVTs and neuropsychological tests. Additionally, the impact of VA service-connection and disability-seeking status on test validity was investigated. Method: A mixed-clinical sample of 103 veterans were administered six PVTs and neuropsychological tests. Performance was compared across three groups: valid-cognitively unimpaired, valid-cognitively impaired, and noncredible. Results: Significant PVT score differences and failure rates emerged across the three groups, with nonsignificant to small differences between valid-unimpaired and valid-impaired groups, and large differences between impaired and noncredible groups. In contrast, there were nonsignificant to small differences on neuropsychological tests between the valid-impaired and noncredible groups, indicating that impaired participants performed significantly better on PVTs despite comparable neurocognitive test scores. Service-connection rating itself was not associated with PVT failure, but an active disability claim to increase and/or establish service connection was associated with worse PVT performance. Conclusion: This study supports the use of multiple PVTs during evaluations of patients with varied cognitive abilities. Results indicated increased risk of PVT failure in patients who were seeking initiation/increase in service-connected payments, and shows that cognitive impairment does not cause PVT failure.
机译:目的:性能有效性测试(PVT)在神经心理学评估中是必不可少的;然而,它已经质疑PVTS在认知障碍的背景下的功能,以及单独的认知障碍是否足以引起PVT失败。此外,担心一些临床医生将忽视失败的PVT,因为他们的感知是代表认知障碍的假阳性误差。该研究检查了与PVT和神经心理学测试的电池相比具有认知性受损性能相关的模式。此外,研究了VA服务连接和残疾人寻求状态对测试有效性的影响。方法:给予103名退伍军人的混合临床样品六个PVT和神经心理学检测。在三组比较方面的比较:有效地认知,未受损,有效地障碍,并不信任。结果:三组出现的显着PVT分数差异和失败利率,不显着于有效的无效和有效受损的群体之间的小差异,障碍和非可供群体之间的巨大差异。相比之下,有效损害和不可提供的群体之间的神经心理测试的小差异不显着,表明,尽管具有相当的神经认知试验评分,但损害的参与者在PVT上显着更好地进行。服务连接额定值本身与PVT失败无关,但是有效的残疾人声称增加和/或建立服务连接与更糟糕的PVT性能相关联。结论:本研究支持在具有多种认知能力的患者的评估期间使用多个PVT。结果表明,正在寻求服务关联支付的患者的PVT失败风险增加,并表明认知障碍不会导致PVT失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号