首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >The Magnitude of Offset Analgesia as a Measure of Endogenous Pain Modulation in Healthy Participants and Patients With Chronic Pain A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

The Magnitude of Offset Analgesia as a Measure of Endogenous Pain Modulation in Healthy Participants and Patients With Chronic Pain A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:作为健康参与者和慢性疼痛患者的内源性疼痛调制的量度的偏移镇痛的幅度和慢性疼痛的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Offset analgesia (OA) is a test paradigm increasingly used to estimate endogenous pain modulation characterized by a disproportionally profound analgesia after a small decrease of a heat stimulus. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the magnitude and difference of OA in healthy participants and chronic pain patients. Materials and Methods: Controlled trials, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, case-series or other observational studies evaluating the effect of a +/- 1 degrees C offset trial in healthy controls and patients with chronic pain were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PEDro, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL. An additional hand search was conducted. Studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria were independently assessed for methodological quality with the Downs and Black scale by 2 reviewers. Results: Twenty-six studies (healthy participants n=758; chronic pain patients n=134) were included in the qualitative synthesis and 12 in meta-analyses (healthy participants n=366; chronic pain patients n=73). A significant difference between offset and constant temperature trials was found for continuous pain intensity rating immediately after a 1 degrees C decrease in temperature (-0.46 [visual analogue scale, 0 to 10]; 95% confidence interval, -0.75 to -0.17; P=0.002), but not after a fixed time period of 5 seconds. Furthermore, a significant difference of the magnitude of OA between chronic pain patients and healthy controls was calculated (-29.9%; 95% confidence interval, -40.3 to -19.5; P<0.00001). Discussion: Results indicate that pain-free participants show a larger OA response when rating pain continuously compared with individuals with chronic pain.
机译:目的:偏移镇痛(OA)是一种试验范式,越来越多地用于估计在热刺激的小减少后,估计具有不成比例的深度镇痛的内源性疼痛调节。该系统审查和荟萃分析检测了健康参与者和慢性疼痛患者的OA的大小和差异。材料和方法:对治疗+/- 1摄氏度试验的对照试验,病例对照研究,横断面研究,病例系列或其他观察性研究在PubMed中搜查了+/- 1摄氏度抵消试验的健康对照和慢性疼痛患者的影响。科学网站,CINAHL,PEDRO,PSYCINFO和Cochrane Central。进行了额外的手进行搜索。履行资格标准的研究独立地评估了2名审稿人的缩小和黑色等级的方法。结果:二十六项研究(健康参与者n = 758;慢性疼痛患者N = 134)被列入定性合成和12例中的12例(健康参与者N = 366;慢性疼痛患者N = 73)。偏移和恒定温度试验之间的显着差异是在1℃的温度下降后立即用于连续疼痛强度等级(-0.46 [视觉模拟标度,0至10]; 95%置信区间,-0.75至-0.17; p = 0.002),但在固定时间后5秒钟后。此外,计算慢性疼痛患者和健康对照之间的OA大小的显着差异(-29.9%; 95%置信区间,-40.3至-19.5; p <0.00001)。讨论:结果表明,与慢性疼痛的个体相比,无痛苦的参与者显示出较大的OA响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号