首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Incidence of Ventral Hernia Repair after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Open Aortofemoral or Aortoiliac Bypass Surgery: An Analysis of 17,594 Patients in the State of New York
【24h】

Incidence of Ventral Hernia Repair after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Open Aortofemoral or Aortoiliac Bypass Surgery: An Analysis of 17,594 Patients in the State of New York

机译:腹侧腹膜炎患者发生腹部修复率,开放腹主动脉瘤和开放主动脉或主动物旁路手术:17,594名纽约患者分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the rate of ventral hernia repair (VHR) after open abdominal aortic anneurysm in New York State compared with the rate of VHR after open abdominal aortic bypass procedures. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for all abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and bypass procedures performed between 2000 and 2010. Social security death index was used to identify patients who died. The cause-specific Cox proportional hazard model was applied to compare the risk of having follow-up VHR between patients with AAA and bypass with death as a competing risk event. A multivariable model was used to explore independent relationship with the risk of having follow-up ventral hernia after adjusting for other factors. There were 9314 patients who underwent open AAA repair, 739 (7.93%) of which had subsequent VHR. Comparatively, 8280 patients underwent aortofemoral or aortoiliac bypass procedures, with 480 (5.8%) undergoing subsequent VHR. The observed one-year, five-year, and 10-year VHR rates for AAA versus bypass were 2.8 versus 1.8 per cent, 10.0 versus 8.0 per cent, 10.7 versus 9.38 per cent, respectively. After controlling for all other factors, patients undergoing AAA repair were more likely and elderly patients were less likely to undergo VHR (P < 0.0001). Patients with serious comorbid conditions such as valvular disease, diabetes mellitus, and neurologic disorders were less likely to undergo subsequent VHR controlling for other factors. VHR after AAA procedures is more common compared with bypass procedures for occlusive disease. Because this patient population has significant comorbidity, prophylactic mesh placement may play a role in preventing necessity for future procedures.
机译:我们研究的目的是评估纽约状态开放腹主动脉窝囊后腹疝修复(VHR)的速率与VHR开放后的腹主动脉旁路手术后VHR的速率相比。为主腹主动脉瘤(AAA)和2000年至2010年之间的旁路程序询问了州所有的规划和研究合作系统数据库。社会保障死亡指数用于识别死亡的患者。应用原因特异性Cox比例危害模型以比较AAA患者与旁路与死亡旁路之间具有随访的风险,作为竞争风险事件。多变量模型用于探索与在调整其他因素后进行后续腹侧疝的风险的独立关系。有9314名患者接受开放的AAA修复,739(7.93%),其中vhr随后。相比之下,8280名患者接受了主动作用或主动脉的旁路程序,其中480(5.8%)正在进行的VHR。观察到的一年,五年和10年的AAA与旁路的VHR率为2.8与1.8%,10.0与8.0%,10.7%分别为9.38%。在控制所有其他因素后,接受AAA修复的患者更有可能,老年患者不太可能经历VHR(P <0.0001)。瓣膜疾病,糖尿病如瓣膜疾病和神经系统疾病等严重患者的患者不太可能进行其他因素的VHR控制。 VHR AAA程序与旁路疾病的旁路程序更常见。因为这种患者群具有显着的合并症,所以预防网格放置可能在防止未来程序中的必要性中发挥作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American surgeon.》 |2018年第8期|共6页
  • 作者

    MARIA S. ALTIERI;

  • 作者单位

    Division of Bariatric Foregut and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Surgery Stony;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号