首页> 外文期刊>The anatomical record: advances in integrative anatomy and evolutionary biology >The Frontoparietal Fossa and Dorsotemporal Fenestra of Archosaurs and Their Significance for Interpretations of Vascular and Muscular Anatomy in Dinosaurs
【24h】

The Frontoparietal Fossa and Dorsotemporal Fenestra of Archosaurs and Their Significance for Interpretations of Vascular and Muscular Anatomy in Dinosaurs

机译:船龙前迁移窝和多莫斯特拉群岛和恐龙在血管和肌肉解剖学解释的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACT The attachments of jaw muscles are typically implicated in the evolution and shape of the dorsotemporal fenestra on the skull roof of amniotes. However, the dorsotemporal fenestrae of many archosaurian reptiles possess smooth excavations rostral and dorsal to the dorsotemporal fossa which closely neighbors the dorsotemporal fenestra and jaw muscle attachments. Previous research has typically identified this region, here termed the frontoparietal fossa, to also have attachment surfaces for jaw‐closing muscles. However, numerous observations of extant and extinct archosaurs described here suggest that other tissues are instead responsible for the size and shape of the frontoparietal fossa. This study reviewed the anatomical evidence that support soft‐tissue hypotheses of the frontoparietal fossa and its phylogenetic distribution among sauropsids. Soft‐tissue hypotheses (i.e., muscle, pneumatic sinus, vascular tissues) were analyzed using anatomical, imaging and in vivo thermography techniques within a phylogenetic framework using extant and extinct taxa to determine the inferential power underlying the reconstruction of the soft tissues in the skull roofs of dinosaurs, pseudosuchians, and other reptiles. Relevant anatomical features argue for rejection of the default hypothesis—that the fossa was muscular—due to a complete lack of osteological correlates reflective of muscle attachment. The most‐supported inference of soft tissues is that the frontoparietal fossa contained a large vascular structure and adipose tissue. Despite the large sizes and diverse morphologies of these fossae found among dinosaur taxa, these data suggest that non‐avian dinosaurs had the anatomical foundation to support physiologically significant vascular devices and/or vascular integumentary structures on their skull roofs. Anat Rec, 303:1060–1074, 2020. ? 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:摘要颌骨肌肉的附着通常涉及在羊皮塞的头骨屋顶上的背稳态芬迈的演变和形状。然而,许多古代山脉爬行动物的Dorsotemporal veneStrae拥有光滑的挖掘机和背部的背摩梭,密切邻居Dorsotemporal Fenestra和颌骨肌附着物。以前的研究通常鉴定了该地区,这里称为前迁徙型窝,还具有用于颌骨闭合肌肉的附着表面。然而,这里描述的远端和灭绝的原子龙的许多观察表明,其他组织是对前迁窝的尺寸和形状负责。本研究综述了支持椎间玉窝的软组织假假设及其在沙丘孔中的系统发育分布的解剖证据。使用现存和灭绝的群组在系统发育框架内使用解剖学,成像和体内热成像技术进行分析软组织假假设(即肌肉,气动窦,血管组织),以确定颅骨中软组织重建的推理权力恐龙,伪血清和其他爬行动物的屋顶。相关解剖学特征争辩拒绝默认假设 - 由于肌肉附着的反射反射性的完全缺乏缺乏成骨相关性,窝是肌肉发达的。软组织最受支持的推理是前迁移窝包含大型血管结构和脂肪组织。尽管在恐龙分类群中发现了这些浮游虫的大尺寸和多样化的形态,但这些数据表明,非禽恐龙的解剖学基础支​​持生理上有明显的血管装置和/或血管整数结构在其头骨上。 ANAT REC,303:1060-1074,2020。 2019 Wiley期刊,Inc。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号