...
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >The status quo as a good outcome: How the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder remained unchanged from the DSM-IV criteria
【24h】

The status quo as a good outcome: How the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder remained unchanged from the DSM-IV criteria

机译:现状为良好的结果:从DSM-IV标准中,如何为广泛性焦虑症的DSM-5诊断标准保持不变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This year finally saw the publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). It was feared that the DSM-5 would take a 'reckless' approach by introducing arbitrary diagnostic criteria, lowering the diagnostic thresholds and unnecessarily increasing the number of diagnoses. Looking at the final product, one can see that, to some extent, these concerns were well founded (Malhi, 2013). However, there are also signs in the DSM-5 of a measured approach. A good example is generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), whose diagnostic criteria in the DSM-5 are the same as those in the DSM-IV.
机译:今年终于看到了精神障碍诊断和统计手册的第五版的出版(DSM-5)。 据担心,DSM-5将通过引入任意诊断标准来采用“鲁莽”的方法,降低诊断阈值并不必要地增加诊断数量。 在某种程度上,看待最终产品,在某种程度上,这些问题得到了充分的成立(Malhi,2013)。 但是,还有测量方法的DSM-5中的迹象。 一个很好的例子是广义焦虑症(GAD),DSM-5中的诊断标准与DSM-IV中的诊断标准相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号