首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and learning in medicine >Social Workers as Workplace-Based Instructors of Alcohol and Drug Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Emergency Medicine Residents
【24h】

Social Workers as Workplace-Based Instructors of Alcohol and Drug Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Emergency Medicine Residents

机译:社会工作者作为工作场所的酒精和药物筛选教练,短暂的干预和转诊治疗(SBIRT)急诊医学居民

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Problem: Residency education is challenged by a shortage of personnel and time, particularly for teaching behavioral interventions such as screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) to reduce hazardous drinking and drug use. However, social workers may be well placed to teach SBIRT in clinical training settings. Intervention: We describe a curriculum with social workers as SBIRT trainers of emergency medicine (EM) residents during actual clinical shifts in an EM residency training program. The curriculum required 1EM faculty member working with social workers and 1 additional hour of formal residency conference teaching time. Context: We implemented the curriculum at both a university tertiary care hospital emergency department and a county trauma center. We trained 8 social workers at both sites as SBIRT superusers to teach and assess EM resident SBIRT performance with actual patients. We measured the length and number of sessions to attain SBIRT competence, residents' satisfaction, and resident comments (coded by authors). Outcome: Five of the 8 social workers trained residents between June 2013 and May 2014, 31 EM residents trained to a level indicating SBIRT competence with 114 patients. Each patient interaction averaged 8.8minutes and residents averaged 3.13 patients. Twenty-four (77%) residents gave ratings of 1.58 (SD = .58) for the quality of teaching, 2.33 (SD = .87) for recommending the training to a colleague, 1.38 (SD = .49) for superusers' knowledge, 1.88 (SD = .95) for usefulness of instruction, 1.54 (SD = .72) for workplace learning, and 1.58 (SD = .78) for valuing learning from social workers (on a scale of 1 [very satisfied/strongly agree] to 5 [very dissatisfied/strongly disagree]). Residents preferred learning SBIRT during the 1st and 2nd training years and in the workplace. Lessons Learned: Social work colleagues can be effective in teaching SBIRT to residents in the workplace, and our residents highly valued learning from social workers, who all had prior training in motivational interviewing. In the implementation of this curriculum, the clinical demands of residents must be taken into account when teaching occurs, and having multiple social worker instructors was instrumental.
机译:问题:居住教育受到人员和时间短缺的挑战,特别是教学行为干预,例如筛查,简短干预和转诊治疗(SBIRT),以减少危险饮酒和吸毒。但是,社会工作者可能会在临床训练环境中教授SBIRT。干预:我们在EM Residency培训计划的实际临床转变期间描述了作为急诊药物(EM)居民的社会工作者的课程。课程需要1EM教师成员与社会工作者合作,以及1小时的正规居住会议教学时间。背景:我们在大学高级护理医院急诊部门和县创伤中心实施了课程。我们在两个站点培训了8个社会工作者作为SBIRT超级用户,使用实际患者进行教学和评估EM居民SBIRT性能。我们衡量了获得SBIRT能力,居民满意度和居民评论的长度和数量(由作者编码)。结果:2013年6月和2014年5月的8名社会工作者中有五名培训,31名EM居民培训,培训了表明SBIRT具有114名患者的SBIRT能力。每个患者的互动平均为8.8分钟,居民平均为3.13名患者。二十四(77%)居民为教学质量提供1.58(SD = .58)的评分,2.33(SD = .87)用于推荐给同事的培训,1.38(SD = .49)进行超级用户的知识,1.88(SD = .95)用于指令的有用性,工作场所学习的1.54(SD = .72),1.58(SD = .78),用于从社会工作者中评估学习(在1的范围内[非常满意/非常同意5 [非常不满/非常不同意])。居民在第一个和第2岁及第二岁及第二次训练期间优先学习SBIRT。经验教训:社会工作同事可以有效地教授工作场所的居民,我们的居民高度尊重社会工作者的学习,他们都有先前的励志面试培训。在执行本课程中,当教学发生时,必须考虑居民的临床需求,并且有多个社会工作者教练有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号