首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and learning in medicine >Social Workers as Workplace-Based Instructors of Alcohol and Drug Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Emergency Medicine Residents
【24h】

Social Workers as Workplace-Based Instructors of Alcohol and Drug Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Emergency Medicine Residents

机译:社会工作者,作为工作场所的酒精和药物筛查,简短干预以及急诊医学居民转诊治疗(SBIRT)的指导员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Problem: Residency education is challenged by a shortage of personnel and time, particularly for teaching behavioral interventions such as screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) to reduce hazardous drinking and drug use. However, social workers may be well placed to teach SBIRT in clinical training settings. Intervention: We describe a curriculum with social workers as SBIRT trainers of emergency medicine (EM) residents during actual clinical shifts in an EM residency training program. The curriculum required 1EM faculty member working with social workers and 1 additional hour of formal residency conference teaching time. Context: We implemented the curriculum at both a university tertiary care hospital emergency department and a county trauma center. We trained 8 social workers at both sites as SBIRT superusers to teach and assess EM resident SBIRT performance with actual patients. We measured the length and number of sessions to attain SBIRT competence, residents' satisfaction, and resident comments (coded by authors). Outcome: Five of the 8 social workers trained residents between June 2013 and May 2014, 31 EM residents trained to a level indicating SBIRT competence with 114 patients. Each patient interaction averaged 8.8minutes and residents averaged 3.13 patients. Twenty-four (77%) residents gave ratings of 1.58 (SD = .58) for the quality of teaching, 2.33 (SD = .87) for recommending the training to a colleague, 1.38 (SD = .49) for superusers' knowledge, 1.88 (SD = .95) for usefulness of instruction, 1.54 (SD = .72) for workplace learning, and 1.58 (SD = .78) for valuing learning from social workers (on a scale of 1 [very satisfied/strongly agree] to 5 [very dissatisfied/strongly disagree]). Residents preferred learning SBIRT during the 1st and 2nd training years and in the workplace. Lessons Learned: Social work colleagues can be effective in teaching SBIRT to residents in the workplace, and our residents highly valued learning from social workers, who all had prior training in motivational interviewing. In the implementation of this curriculum, the clinical demands of residents must be taken into account when teaching occurs, and having multiple social worker instructors was instrumental.
机译:问题:人员和时间的短缺对居住权教育提出了挑战,特别是在教授行为干预措施(例如筛查,短暂干预和转介治疗(SBIRT))以减少有害饮酒和吸毒方面。但是,社会工作者可能很适合在临床培训环境中教授SBIRT。干预:我们将在EM住院医师培训计划中,在实际临床轮班期间,将社会工作者作为急诊医学(EM)居民的SBIRT培训师来描述课程。该课程要求1EM教职员工与社会工作者一起工作,并需要1小时的正式住院医师会议教学时间。背景:我们在大学三级医院急诊科和县创伤中心实施了该课程。我们在两个站点培训了8名社会工作者,作为SBIRT超级用户,以针对实际患者教授和评估EM居民SBIRT的性能。我们测量了获得SBIRT能力,居民满意度和居民评论(由作者编码)的会议时间和次数。结果:2013年6月至2014年5月,在8名社工中培训了5名居民,其中31名EM居民接受了SBIRT能力训练,培训了114名患者。每个病人的互动平均为8.8分钟,而居民平均为3.13个病人。 24位(77%)居民的教学质量得分为1.58(SD = .58),向同事推荐培训的得分为2.33(SD = .87),超级用户的知识得分为1.38(SD = .49) ,1.88(SD = .95)的教学效用,1.54(SD = .72)的工作场所学习和1.58(SD = .78)的评估从社会工作者那里学习的价值(1分(非常满意/非常同意) ]到5 [非常不满意/强烈不同意])。居民更喜欢在第一和第二培训年期间以及在工作场所学习SBIRT。经验教训:社会工作同事可以有效地向工作场所的居民传授SBIRT,我们的居民非常重视向社会工作者学习的知识,他们都曾接受过动机访谈方面的培训。在实施该课程时,教学时必须考虑到居民的临床需求,并且要有多名社会工作者指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号