首页> 外文期刊>Pathology Research and Practice >Utility of pVHL, maspin, IMP3, S100P and Ki67 in the distinction of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
【24h】

Utility of pVHL, maspin, IMP3, S100P and Ki67 in the distinction of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

机译:PVHL,MASPIN,IMP3,S100P和KI67区别于胰腺导管腺癌的自身免疫胰腺炎的实用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Morphology plays an important role in the distinction of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, we aimed to determine the utility of immunohistochemical tumor markers to contribute in the distinction of these entities. In surgical specimens with AIP (n = 20), PDAC (n = 20) and normal pancreas (n = 20), the expression of pVHL, maspin, IMP3, S100P and Ki67 was examined. We evaluated intralobular reactive ducts / acinoductal metaplasia (ILDs) and extralobular ducts (ELDs) in AIP, neoplastic glands in PDAC, and ductal epithelium in the normal pancreas, using a five-tiered scoring system. The Ki67 hot spot index (Ki67-HSPI) was determined manually and using automated digital imaging analysis of virtual double stains of Ki67 and CK8. Besides, sequential dual-immunohistochemical staining of maspin/pVHL, maspin/IMP3 and Ki67/maspin was performed in a subset of the specimens. Strong overexpression of IMP3, maspin, S100P and Ki67 and loss of pVHL was observed in PDAC compared to AIP and normal pancreas. In AIP however, focal and weak aberrant expression was observed with the following proportions in ILDs/ELDs: pVHL in 45 %/85 %, maspin in 30 %/70 %, IMP3 in 55 %/5%, S100P in 10 %/35 % and Ki67-HSPI > 20 % in 15 %/70 %. At least two markers were aberrantly expressed in ILDs/ELDs in 45 %/60 %. The aberrant expression was more pronounced in type 2 AIP compared to type 1. In conclusion, our data indicate that pVHL, maspin, IMP3, S100P and Ki67 can be focal and weak aberrantly expressed in AIP. However, when used as a panel, these markers seem to be useful for the differentiation of AIP from PC.
机译:形态学在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的自身免疫胰腺炎(AIP)的区别起着重要作用。然而,我们旨在确定免疫组织化学肿瘤标志物的效用,以促进这些实体的区别。在具有AIP(n = 20)的外科标本中,PDAC(n = 20)和正常胰腺(n = 20),检查PVH1,MASPIN,IMP3,S100P和KI67的表达。我们使用五层评分系统评估了在PDAC中的AIP,肿瘤腺体中的肿瘤,肿瘤腺体,肿瘤上皮的含量,肿瘤腺体(ELDS)和胰岛膜上皮,使用五层评分系统。 KI67热点指数(KI67-HSPI)是手动确定的,并使用KI67和CK8的虚拟双污渍的自动化数字成像分析。此外,在样品的子集中进行Maspin / PVHL,MASPIN / IMP3和KI67 / MASPIN的顺序双免疫组织化学染色。与AIP和正常胰腺相比,在PDAC中观察到PDAC的强不表达IMP3,MASPIN,S100P和KI67和PVHL的丧失。然而,在AIP中,观察到局灶性和弱异常表达,在ILDS / ELDS中的以下比例中观察到45%/ 85%,MASPIN以30%/ 70%,IMP3为55%/ 5%,10%/ 35 %和ki67-hspi> 20%以15%/ 70%。在45%/ 60%的ILDS / ELD中,至少两种标记在45%/ 60%中表达。与类型1相比,2型AIP中异常表达更明显。总之,我们的数据表明PVHL,MASPIN,IMP3,S100P和KI67可以在AIP中焦点和弱异常表达。但是,当用作面板时,这些标记似乎对来自PC的AIP的分化有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号