首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >First-trimester pre-eclampsia biomarker profiles in Asian population: multicenter cohort study
【24h】

First-trimester pre-eclampsia biomarker profiles in Asian population: multicenter cohort study

机译:亚洲人口中的第一春季前春季前普利坦斯生物标志物概况:多中心队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives To (i) evaluate the applicability of the European-derived biomarker multiples of the median (MoM) formulae for risk assessment of preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) in seven Asian populations, spanning the east, southeast and south regions of the continent, (ii) perform quality-assurance (QA) assessment of the biomarker measurements and (iii) establish criteria for prospective ongoing QA assessment of biomarker measurements. Methods This was a prospective, non-intervention, multicenter study in 4023 singleton pregnancies, at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation, in 11 recruiting centers in China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand. Women were screened for preterm PE between December 2016 and June 2018 and gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Maternal and pregnancy characteristics were recorded and mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and maternal serum placental growth factor (PlGF) were measured in accordance with The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) standardized measurement protocols. MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF were transformed into MoMs using the published FMF formulae, derived from a largely Caucasian population in Europe, which adjust for gestational age and covariates that affect directly the biomarker levels. Variations in biomarker MoM values and their dispersion (SD) and cumulative sum tests over time were evaluated in order to identify systematic deviations in biomarker measurements from the expected distributions. Results In the total screened population, the median (95% CI) MoM values of MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF were 0.961 (0.956-0.965), 1.018 (0.996-1.030) and 0.891 (0.861-0.909), respectively. Women in this largely Asian cohort had approximately 4% and 11% lower MAP and PlGF MoM levels, respectively, compared with those expected from normal median formulae, based on a largely Caucasian population, whilst UtA-PI MoM values were similar. UtA-PI and PlGF MoMs were beyond the 0.4 to 2.5 MoM range (truncation limits) in 16 (0.4%) and 256 (6.4%) pregnancies, respectively. QA assessment tools indicated that women in all centers had consistently lower MAP MoM values than expected, but were within 10% of the expected value. UtA-PI MoM values were within 10% of the expected value at all sites except one. Most PlGF MoM values were systematically 10% lower than the expected value, except for those derived from a South Asian population, which were 37% higher. Conclusions Owing to the anthropometric differences in Asian compared with Caucasian women, significant differences in biomarker MoM values for PE screening, particularly MAP and PlGF MoMs, were noted in Asian populations compared with the expected values based on European-derived formulae. If reliable and consistent patient-specific risks for preterm PE are to be reported, adjustment for additional factors or development of Asian-specific formulae for the calculation of biomarker MoMs is required. We have also demonstrated the importance and need for regular quality assessment of biomarker values. Copyright (c) 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:(i)举办七个亚洲人口,评估欧洲衍生的生物标志物(PE)的欧洲衍生的生物标志物倍数的适用性,七个亚洲人群,跨越大陆的东部,东南和南部地区, (ii)对生物标志物测量的质量保证(QA)评估和(iii)建立前瞻性核心QA评估的前瞻性QA评估标准。方法这是在4023名单身怀孕的前瞻性,非干预,在11至13 + 6周内妊娠,在11至13 + 6周内,在中国,香港,印度,日本,新加坡,台湾和泰国招聘中心。 2016年12月至2018年6月在2018年12月至2018年6月之间筛选了女性,并给予了书面知情同意参加该研究。记录母体和妊娠特征,平均动脉压(MAP),平均子宫动脉脉动率指数(UTA-PI)和母体血清胎盘生长因子(PLGF)根据胎儿基础(FMF)标准化的测量方案来测量。地图,UTA-PI和PLGF使用出版的FMF配方转变为MOMS,源于欧洲的大部分高加索人口,调整直接影响生物标志物水平的孕龄和协变量。评估生物标志物MOM值及其分散(SD)和其分散(SD)和累积总和测试的变化,以识别来自预期分布的生物标志物测量中的系统偏差。结果筛选总筛选人群,中位数(95%CI)MOM值的MAP,UTA-PI和PLGF为0.961(0.956-0.965),1.018(0.996-1.030)和0.891(0.861-0.909)。与普通中位式公式的预期相比,这一主要亚洲队列的女性主要有大约4%和11%的地图和11%的地图和PLGF妈妈水平,而uta-pi妈妈的价值观相似。 UTA-PI和PLGF MOMS分别超过16(0.4%)和256(6.4%)妊娠的0.4至2.5个母振距(截断限制)。 QA评估工具表明,所有中心的女性都始终如一地降低了地图MOM值,但在预期的10%以内。 UTA-PI MOM值在所有网站的预期价值的10%范围内以外的所有网站。大多数PLGF妈妈值系统地比预期值低10%,除了源于南亚人群的人,比南亚人口占37%。结论由于亚洲与白种人女性相比,亚洲妇女的人类差异,与基于欧洲衍生的公式的预期值相比,在亚洲群体中注意到PE筛查,特别是地图和PLGF妈妈的生物标志物妈妈值的显着差异。如果要报告预先和一致的预患者特异性的患者特异性风险,需要调整用于计算生物标志物妈妈的亚洲特异性公式的额外因素或开发。我们还表明了对生物标志物价值的定期质量评估的重要性和需求。版权所有(c)2019 isuog。 John Wiley&Sons Ltd.出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号