首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology >DYNAMIC CEREBRAL AUTOREGULATION ASSESSMENT USING EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY
【24h】

DYNAMIC CEREBRAL AUTOREGULATION ASSESSMENT USING EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY

机译:使用颅内内颈动脉多普勒超声检查动态脑自动调节评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is frequently used to assess dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA); however, this is difficult in patients with poor temporal bone windows. In the study described here, we investigated the agreement and sensitivity of dCA indices determined from the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and those determined from the MCA. Measurements for 32 stroke patients and 59 controls were analyzed. Measurement of the mean flow correlation index (Mx) and transfer function analysis based on spontaneous blood pressure fluctuation were simultaneously performed for the extracranial ICA and MCA. The mean values of Mx and phase shift did not significantly differ between the ICA and MCA (mean difference: Mx 5 0.01; phase shift of very low frequency [VLF] 5 0.7 degrees, low frequency [LF] 5 3.3 degrees and high frequency = 4.5 degrees), but the gains in VLF and LF in the ICA were significantly lower than those in the MCA (mean difference: gain of VLF = -0.13, gain of LF = -0.10). The intra-class correlation coefficient between the dCA indices of the ICA and MCA was favorable in Mx (0.76) and the phase shift of VLF (0.72). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for stroke diagnosis did not differ among the dCA indices. We conclude that dCA assessed from the ICA is as effective as that from the MCA, but the results are not interchangeable. (E-mail: naifangchi@tmu.edu.tw) (C) 2017 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
机译:中间脑动脉(MCA)的经颅多普勒超声检查经常用于评估动态脑自动调节(DCA);然而,颞骨窗口差的患者难以。在这里描述的研究中,我们调查了从颅内内颈动脉(ICA)确定的DCA指数的协议和敏感性,并从MCA确定的那些。分析了32例中风患者和59例对照的测量。同时对颅外ICA和MCA进行平均流量相关指数(MX)和基于自发性血压波动的传递函数分析。 ICA和MCA之间的MX和相移的平均值(平均差异:MX 5 0.01;非常低频[VLF]的相移5.7度,低频[LF] 5 3.3度和高频= 4.5度),但ICA中VLF和LF中的增益显着低于MCA中的(平均差:VLF = -0.13的增益,LF = -0.10的增益)。 ICA和MCA的DCA索引之间的类内相关系数有利于MX(0.76)和VLF的相移(0.72)。接收器下的区域用于笔划诊断的特征曲线在DCA指数中没有区别。我们得出结论,从ICA评估的DCA与MCA的评估一样有效,但结果不可互换。 (电子邮件:Naifangchi@tmu.edu.tw)(c)2017年美国超声联合会医学与生物学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号