...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychosomatics >Validation of a Nurse-Based Delirium-Screening Tool for Hospitalized Patients
【24h】

Validation of a Nurse-Based Delirium-Screening Tool for Hospitalized Patients

机译:验证住院患者的护士谵妄筛查工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Guidelines recommend daily delirium monitoring of hospitalized patients. Available delirium-screening tools have not been validated for use by nurses among diverse inpatients. Objective We sought to validate the Nursing Delirium-Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) under these circumstances. Methods A blinded cross-sectional and quality-improvement study was conducted from August 2015–February 2016. Nurses? Nu-DESC scores were compared to delirium diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) criteria. A total of 405 consecutive hospitalized patients were included. Nu-DESC-positive (threshold score ≥2) patients were matched with equal numbers of Nu-DESC-negative patients, by sex, age, and nursing unit. Nurses recorded a Nu-DESC score for each patient on every 12-hour shift. A Nu-DESC-blinded evaluator interviewed patients for 2 consecutive days. Delirium diagnosis was determined by physicians using DSM-5 criteria applied to collected research data. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nu-DESC were calculated. In an exploratory analysis, the performance of the Nu-DESC was analyzed with the addition of bedside measures of attention. Results The sensitivity of the Nu-DESC at a threshold of ≥2 was 42% (95% CI: 33–53%). Specificity was 98% (97–98%). At a threshold of ≥1, sensitivity was 67% (52–80%) and specificity 93% (90–95%). Similar results were found with the addition of attention tasks. Conclusion The Nu-DESC is a specific delirium detection tool, but it is not sensitive at the usually proposed cut point of ≥2. Using a threshold of ≥1 or adding a test of attention increase sensitivity with a minor decrease in specificity.
机译:背景指南推荐每日谵妄监测住院患者。可用的谵妄筛选工具尚未验证,用于各种住院患者的护士使用。目的我们试图在这些情况下验证护理谵妄筛查量表(NU-DESC)。方法从2015年8月至2016年2月开始致盲的横截面和质量改善研究。护士?根据精神障碍-5(DSM-5)标准的诊断和统计手册,将NU-DESC分数与谵妄诊断进行比较。共有405名连续住院治疗的患者。 Nu-DESC阳性(阈值分数≥2)患者与相同数量的NU-DESC阴性患者,性别,年龄和护理单位匹配。护士每12小时轮班录制每位患者的NU-DESC得分。一名Nu-desc-bloweded评估员连续2天采访了患者。谵妄诊断由使用应用于收集的研究数据的DSM-5标准的医生确定。计算NU-DESC的敏感性和特异性。在探索性分析中,通过添加床边的注意措施,分析了NU-DESC的性能。结果Nu-DESC在≥2的阈值下的敏感性为42%(95%CI:33-53%)。特异性为98%(97-98%)。在≥1的阈值,敏感性为67%(52-80%)和特异性93%(90-95%)。在添加注意任务中发现了类似的结果。结论NU-DESC是一种特定的谵妄检测工具,但在≥2的通常提出的切割点处不敏感。使用≥1的阈值或添加注意力的测试增加了特异性微小的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号