...
首页> 外文期刊>Quintessence international >The effects of erythritol air-polishing powder on microbiologic and clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy: Six-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
【24h】

The effects of erythritol air-polishing powder on microbiologic and clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy: Six-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

机译:赤藓糖醇空气抛光粉对支撑牙周治疗过程中微生物和临床结果的影响:随机对照临床试验的六个月结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To characterize the physical characteristics of a new low abrasive erythritol powder (EPAP) and to evaluate its influence on the clinical and microbiologic parameters over a period of 6 months in patients undergoing supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Method and Materials: Prior to the clinical application, the particle size and abrasion level of EPAP were compared to glycine air-polishing powder (GPAP) ex vivo. Subsequently, 40 chronic periodontitis patients previously enrolled in SPT were randomly assigned into two groups for the treatment with subgingival EPAP or repeated scaling and root planing (SRP). At baseline (BL), bleeding on probing positive (BOP+) sites with probing pocket depth (PPD) of >= 4 mm but no detectable calculus were defined as study sites. During SPT, these sites were either treated by EPAP or SRP at BL, 3, and 6 months (3M, 6M). When indicated, additional SRP was provided. Plaque Index, BOP, PPD, clinical attachment level (CAL), and subgingival plaque were evaluated at BL and 6M. Results: EPAP yielded lower abrasiveness and smaller particle sizes when compared to GPAP. In 38 patients completing the study, EPAP and SRP resulted in significant reductions of BOP% (EPAP, 40.45%; SRP, 42.53%), PPD (EPAP, -0.67; SRP, -0.68), and increase of CAL (EPAP, 0.48; SRP, 0.61) while at 6M no statistically significant between-group differences were observed (P > .05). Microbiologic evaluation revealed minor shifts in the composition of the subgingival biofilm without influence on periodontopathogenic bacteria. Conclusion: The subgingival use of EPAP by means of an air-polishing device may be considered safe and may lead to comparable clinical and microbiologic outcomes to those obtained with SRP. Clinical Relevance: The subgingival use of EPAP appears to represent a promising modality for the removal of subgingival biofilm during SPT.
机译:目的:要表征新的低磨料红外醇粉(EPAP)的物理特征,并在接受支持性牙周治疗(SPT)的患者中,评估其对6个月的临床和微生物学参数的影响。方法和材料:在临床应用之前,将EPAP的粒度和磨损水平与甘氨酸空气抛光粉(GPAP)进行比较。随后,将先前注册SPT的40名慢性牙周炎患者随机分配到两组中,用于用龈下EPAP或重复的缩放和根刨(SRP)。在基线(BL)时,探测垂直(PPD)> = 4mm> = 4mm的阳性(BOP +)位点出血,但没有可检测的微积分被定义为研究部位。在SPT期间,这些位点由EPAP或SRP治疗BL,3和6个月(3M,6M)。指示后,提供了额外的SRP。在BL和6M中评估斑块指数,BOP,PPD,临床附着水平(CAL)和潜在牙菌斑。结果:与GPAP相比,EPAP在与GPAP相比时产生较低的磨料和较小的粒径。在38例患者中完成研究,EPAP和SRP导致BOP%的显着减少(EPAP,40.45%; SRP,42.53%),PPD(EPAP,-0.67; SRP,-0.68)和CAL的增加(EPAP,0.48 ; SRP,0.61)虽然在6米处未观察到组差异之间的统计学意义(p> .05)。微生物学评估显示龈下生物膜的组成中的微生物偏移,而不会影响牙周病性细菌。结论:借助于空气抛光装置的EPAP的龈下使用可能被认为是安全的,并且可能导致与SRP获得的那些相当的临床和微生物结果。临床相关性:EPAP的龈下使用似乎代表了在SPT期间去除龈下生物膜的有希望的模态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号