...
首页> 外文期刊>Quintessence international >The effects of erythritol air-polishing powder on microbiologic and clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy: Six-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
【24h】

The effects of erythritol air-polishing powder on microbiologic and clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy: Six-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

机译:赤藓糖醇空气抛光粉对支持性牙周治疗期间微生物学和临床结果的影响:一项随机对照临床试验的六个月结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To characterize the physical characteristics of a new low abrasive erythritol powder (EPAP) and to evaluate its influence on the clinical and microbiologic parameters over a period of 6 months in patients undergoing supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Method and Materials: Prior to the clinical application, the particle size and abrasion level of EPAP were compared to glycine air-polishing powder (GPAP) ex vivo. Subsequently, 40 chronic periodontitis patients previously enrolled in SPT were randomly assigned into two groups for the treatment with subgingival EPAP or repeated scaling and root planing (SRP). At baseline (BL), bleeding on probing positive (BOP+) sites with probing pocket depth (PPD) of >= 4 mm but no detectable calculus were defined as study sites. During SPT, these sites were either treated by EPAP or SRP at BL, 3, and 6 months (3M, 6M). When indicated, additional SRP was provided. Plaque Index, BOP, PPD, clinical attachment level (CAL), and subgingival plaque were evaluated at BL and 6M. Results: EPAP yielded lower abrasiveness and smaller particle sizes when compared to GPAP. In 38 patients completing the study, EPAP and SRP resulted in significant reductions of BOP% (EPAP, 40.45%; SRP, 42.53%), PPD (EPAP, -0.67; SRP, -0.68), and increase of CAL (EPAP, 0.48; SRP, 0.61) while at 6M no statistically significant between-group differences were observed (P > .05). Microbiologic evaluation revealed minor shifts in the composition of the subgingival biofilm without influence on periodontopathogenic bacteria. Conclusion: The subgingival use of EPAP by means of an air-polishing device may be considered safe and may lead to comparable clinical and microbiologic outcomes to those obtained with SRP. Clinical Relevance: The subgingival use of EPAP appears to represent a promising modality for the removal of subgingival biofilm during SPT.
机译:目的:表征新型低磨蚀性赤藓糖醇粉(EPAP)的物理特性,并评估其在接受牙周支持治疗(SPT)的患者中在六个月内对临床和微生物学参数的影响。方法和材料:在临床应用之前,将EPAP的粒径和耐磨性与离体甘氨酸空气抛光粉(GPAP)进行了比较。随后,将40例先前参加SPT的慢性牙周炎患者随机分为两组,分别进行龈下EPAP或重复刮除和根治(SRP)治疗。在基线(BL),探测口袋深度(PPD)> = 4 mm但没有可检测到的结石的探测阳性(BOP +)部位的出血被定义为研究部位。在SPT期间,在BL,3和6个月(3M,6M)通过EPAP或SRP处理这些部位。指示时,将提供其他SRP。在BL和6M处评估斑块指数,BOP,PPD,临床依从水平(CAL)和龈下斑块。结果:与GPAP相比,EPAP的磨蚀性更低,粒径更小。在38位完成研究的患者中,EPAP和SRP导致BOP%(EPAP,40.45%; SRP,42.53%),PPD(EPAP,-0.67; SRP,-0.68)显着降低,而CAL(EPAP,0.48) ; SRP为0.61),而在6M时未观察到组间差异有统计学意义(P> .05)。微生物学评估显示,龈下生物膜的成分发生了微小变化,而对牙周病原菌没有影响。结论:通过空气抛光装置在龈下使用EPAP可能被认为是安全的,并且可能导致与SRP相比可比较的临床和微生物学结果。临床意义:EPAP的龈下使用似乎代表了在SPT期间去除龈下生物膜的一种有前途的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号