...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality management in health care >A Mixed-Method Study of Practitioners' Perspectives on Issues Related to EHR Medication Reconciliation at a Health System
【24h】

A Mixed-Method Study of Practitioners' Perspectives on Issues Related to EHR Medication Reconciliation at a Health System

机译:卫生系统EHR药物和解相关问题的混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: In an effort to reduce medication discrepancies during transitions of care and improve accuracy of the patient's medication list, AU Health conducted a study to identify a comprehensive set of issues related to electronic health record (EHR) medication reconciliation (MedRec) from the perspective of practitioners directly involved in the EHR MedRec process. Methods: An exploratory mixed-method design was used. The 2-round study included 15 individual interviews, followed by a survey of 200 practitioners (ie, physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) based in the outpatient and inpatient medicine service at AU Health. Results: Thematic analysis of interview data identified 55 issue items related to EHR MedRec under 9 issue categories. The survey sought practitioners' importance rating of all issue items identified from interviews. A total of 127 (63%) survey responses were received. Factor analysis served to validate the following 6 of the 9 issue categories, all of which were rated "important" or higher (on average), by over 70% of all respondents: (1) care coordination (CCI); (2) patient education (PEI); (3) ownership and accountability (OAI); (4) processes-of-care (PCI); (5) IT-related (ITRI); and (6) workforce training (WTI). Significance testing of importance rating by professional affiliation revealed no statistically significant differences for CCI and PEI, and some statistically significant differences for OAI, PCI, ITRI, and WTI. Conclusion: There were 2 key gleanings from the issues related to EHR MedRec unearthed by this study: (1) there was an absence of shared understanding among practitioners, of the value of EHR MedRec in promoting patient safety, which contributed to workarounds, and suboptimal use of the EHR MedRec system; and (2) there was a sociotechnical dimension to many of the issues, creating an added layer of complexity. These gleanings, in turn, provide insights into best practices for managing both (1) clinical transitions of care in the EHR MedRec process and (2) sociotechnical challenges encountered in EHR MedRec implementation.
机译:背景:为了减少护理过渡期间的药物差异,提高患者药物清单的准确性,AU卫生向识别与电子卫生记录(EHR)药物和解(MEDREC)的一项综合作品的研究从业者直接参与EHR MedRec进程。方法:使用探索混合方法设计。两轮学习包括15个个别访谈,其次是在Au Health的门诊和住院医学服务的200名从业者(即医生,护士和药剂师)的调查。结果:采访数据的主题分析确定了与9号问题的EHR MEDREC相关的55个问题。该调查寻求从业者对采访中确定的所有问题项目的重要性评级。收到了127名(63%)的调查答复。因素分析服务验证了9个问题类别的以下6个,所有这些都被评为“重要”或更高(平均),超过所有受访者的70%:(1)护理协调(CCI); (2)患者教育(PEI); (3)所有权和问责制(OAI); (4)护理过程(PCI); (5)与IT相关(ITRI); (6)劳动力培训(WTI)。专业隶属关系重视评级的重要性测试显示,CCI和PEI没有统计学意义差异,以及OAI,PCI,ITRI和WTI的一些统计学上显着差异。结论:这项研究有2个与EHR Medrec相关问题的关键收集者:(1)从业人员没有共同的理解,EHR MEDREC在促进患者安全方面的价值,这导致了解决方法和次优使用EHR MEDREC系统; (2)许多问题都有一个社会技术维度,创造了一个复杂层。反过来,这些收集者提供了对管理(1)ehr Medrec进程中的(1)临床护理的最佳实践的见解,并在EHR MedRec实施中遇到的社会技术挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号