首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
【24h】

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

机译:科学,技术,工程和数学教育中的性别平等悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The underrepresentation of girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is a continual concern for social scientists and policymakers. Using an international database on adolescent achievement in science, mathematics, and reading (N = 472,242), we showed that girls performed similarly to or better than boys in science in two of every three countries, and in nearly all countries, more girls appeared capable of college-level STEM study than had enrolled. Paradoxically, the sex differences in the magnitude of relative academic strengths and pursuit of STEM degrees rose with increases in national gender equality. The gap between boys' science achievement and girls' reading achievement relative to their mean academic performance was near universal. These sex differences in academic strengths and attitudes toward science correlated with the STEM graduation gap. A mediation analysis suggested that life-quality pressures in less gender-equal countries promote girls' and women's engagement with STEM subjects.
机译:女性和妇女在科学,技术,工程和数学(Stew)领域的不足是对社会科学家和政策制定者的不断关注。使用国际数据库在科学,数学和阅读中的青少年成就(n = 472,242),我们展示了与每三个国家中两国的两个人同样地表演或更好地表演,并且在几乎所有国家,更多的女孩出现了有能力的大学级词干研究比注册。矛盾的是,相对学术优势的性别差异和追求词干程度的差异随着国家性别平等的增加而增加。男孩科学成果与女孩阅读成就与均值近的差距近乎普遍。这些性别差异和对科学的态度与茎毕业差距相关。调解分析表明,性别平等国家的生活质量压力促进了女孩的女性和妇女与干科的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号