...
首页> 外文期刊>Sport sciences for health >Kinematic analysis of postural control in gymnasts vs. athletes practicing different sports
【24h】

Kinematic analysis of postural control in gymnasts vs. athletes practicing different sports

机译:体操运动员姿态控制的运动学分析。 运动员练习不同的运动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the postural control difference between gymnasts and other athletes practicing different sports. Methods Twenty-eight elite-level male athletes (7 gymnasts, 7 volleyball players, 7 windsurfers, and 7 monofin swimmers) participated in this study. Two-dimensional kinematic analysis of mediolateral and anteroposterior sway velocity of the center of mass (COM) on single plane balance board in bipedal and unipedal conditions, and on hard and foam surfaces was performed using two cameras (Sony, DCR-PC108E, 50 Hz). Data were digitized using the video-based data analysis system SkillSpector. Results Findings showed significant between groups differences regardless of the postural stance i.e., unipedal or bipedal (d = 1.76-6.82, p < 0.01). In this regards, windsurfers presented the best postural performance in terms of sway velocity of the COM followed by gymnasts, volleyball players, and monofin swimmers. Furthermore, regardless of the postural stance, significant differences between surfaces (d = 0.61-1.03, p < 0.05) were established. In this context, COM's sway velocity was higher for hard compared with foam surfaces for all disciplines (d = 0.75-0.66, p < 0.05) except monofin swimmers who presented higher COM's sway velocity in foam compared to hard surfaces. Further, in the anteroposterior stance, windsurfers and gymnasts showed significantly lower floor contacts number compared with the other groups (d= 1.76-2.39, p<0.01). However, volleyball players and monofin swimmers showed comparable postural performance in the mediolateral plane. Conclusions The windsurfers presented the best postural control followed by gymnasts, volleyball players, and monofin swimmers irrespective of the surface's nature (i.e., hard or foam) and postural stance (i.e., bipedal or unipedal). Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate windsurfing practice to promote postural control of gymnastic athletes.
机译:目的本研究的目的是研究体操运动员和其他运动员练习不同运动的运动员之间的姿势控制差异。方法二十八家精英级男运动员(7体操运动员,7名排球运动员,7名风帆器和7名Monofin Swinmers)参加了这项研究。使用两台摄像机(SONY,DCR-PC108E,50Hz )。使用基于视频的数据分析系统技能光学来数字化数据。结果结果表明,无论姿势姿势,少于姿势,单一或双表达,在这方面,风帆冲浪者在COM的摇摆速度方面提出了最佳的姿势性能,然后是体操运动员,排球运动员和Monofin游泳者。此外,无论姿势姿势如何,建立了表面(D = 0.61-1.03,P <0.05)之间的显着差异。在这种情况下,与所有学科的泡沫表面相比,COM的摇摆速度较高(D = 0.75-0.66,P <0.05),除了Monofin游泳者与硬表面相比呈现出更高的COM摇摆速度的Monofin游泳运动员。此外,在前后姿势中,与其他组相比,帆篷和体操运动物显示出明显较低的楼层触点数(D = 1.76-2.39,P <0.01)。然而,排球运动员和Monofin游泳运动员在MediolAtheral平面上表现出相当的姿势性能。结论风帆冲浪者展示了最好的姿势控制,随后是体操运动员,排球运动员和Monofin游泳者,而不论表面的性质(即硬质或泡沫)和姿势姿势(即双层或多管)。因此,建议纳入风帆冲浪实践以促进体操运动员的姿势控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号