首页> 外文期刊>Public health >Evaluation of an online training for improving self-reported evidence-based decision-making skills in cancer control among public health professionals
【24h】

Evaluation of an online training for improving self-reported evidence-based decision-making skills in cancer control among public health professionals

机译:评估在公共卫生专业人员之间提高自我报告的循证决策技能的在线培训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the effect of the online evidence-based cancer control (EBCC) training on improving the self-reported evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) skills in cancer control among Nebraska public health professionals. Study design Cross-sectional group comparison. Methods Previously developed EBDM measures were administered via online surveys to 201 public health professionals at baseline (comparison group) and 123 professionals who took part in the training. Respondents rated the importance of and their skill level in 18 EBCC skills. Differences were examined using analysis of variance models adjusted for gender, age, years at agency, and years in position, and stratified by respondent educational attainment. Results Among professionals without an advanced degree, training participants reported higher overall skill scores ( P ?=?.016) than the baseline non-participant group, primarily driven by differences in the partnerships and collaboration and evaluation domains. No differences in importance ratings were observed. Among professionals with advanced degrees, there were no differences in skill scores and small differences in importance scores in the expected direction ( P ? Conclusions EBCC led to improved self-reported EBDM skills among public health professionals without an advanced degree, though a gap remained between the self-reported skills and the perceived importance of the skills. Further research on training content and modalities for professionals with higher educational attainment and baseline skill scores is needed. Highlights ? The evidence-based cancer control training was evaluated with Nebraska public health workers. ? Participants without advanced degrees reported higher skill scores than respondents at baseline. ? No differences were found among respondents with an advanced degree. ? Online trainings can be cost-effective alternatives for professionals without advanced degrees. ? More research is needed on training content and modalities for professionals with advanced degrees.
机译:摘要目的本评价的目的是评估在线证据的癌症控制(EBCC)培训提高内布拉斯加州公共卫生专业人员在癌症控制中提高自我报告的循证决策(EBDM)技能的影响。研究设计横截面群体比较。通过在线调查通过在线调查到基线(比较小组)和参加培训的123名专业人员,通过在线调查进行eBDM措施。受访者评估了18个EBCC技能的重要性及其技能水平。使用对性别,年龄,代理年龄,代理年龄的年龄,年龄,年龄年龄的差异模型进行分析,并被受访者教育程度分解。没有高级学位的专业人士,培训参与者报告的总体技能评分更高(P?= 016),而不是基线非参与者组,主要由伙伴关系和协作和评估领域的差异驱动。没有观察到重要性评级的差异。在具有高级学位的专业人员中,在预期的方向上没有技能分数和重要分数的小差异(P?结论EBCC导致公共卫生专业人士在没有高级学位的公共卫生专业人员之间改善自我报告的EBDM技能,尽管仍然存在差距自我报告的技能和感知技能的重要性。需要进一步研究培训内容和具有高等教育程度和基线技能评分的专业人士的方式。亮点?随着内布拉斯加州公共卫生工作者评估了基于证据的癌症控制培训。 ?没有高级学位的参与者报告的技能得分高于基线的受访者。受访者在具有高级学位的受访者中没有发现差异。?在没有高级学位的专业人士的在线培训可以是经济高效的替代方案。?需要更多的研究培训内容和培训内容专业人士的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号