...
首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Artificial Intelligence >Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
【24h】

Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States

机译:在美国口服抗凝血剂治疗的住院性非衰高性颤动患者中入院的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To compare the risks of 1-month all-cause, major bleeding (MB)-related and stroke-related readmissions and the associated hospital resource use and costs among patients previously hospitalized for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran vs apixaban. Methods: Adult patients hospitalized with NVAF (any discharge diagnosis position) who received apixaban, warfarin, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran during hospitalization were identified from the Premier database (1 January 2013-30 June 2017) and grouped into respective cohorts. Propensity score matching was used to generate cohorts with similar characteristics. In regression analyses the risk of readmissions that occurred within 1 month of discharge were evaluated and the associated length of stay (LOS) and costs compared. Results: NVAF patients treated with warfarin vs apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.08; p < .001), MB-related (OR: 1.28; CI: 1.16-1.42; p < .001), and stroke-related (OR: 1.33; CI: 1.11-1.58; p = .002) readmissions; for all readmission categories, average LOS was significantly longer and costs significantly higher for warfarin treated patients. NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (OR: 1.06; CI: 1.02-1.09; p = .001) and MB-related (OR = 1.62; CI = 1.44-1.83; p < .001) readmissions, but not stroke-related readmission; for MB-related readmissions average LOS and costs were higher for rivaroxaban treated patients. Significant differences in risks of all-cause, MB-related, and stroke-related readmissions were not observed between the apixaban and dabigatran cohorts. Conclusion: In this retrospective real-world analysis of NVAF patients, apixaban treatment was associated with better clinical outcomes than warfarin or rivaroxaban and lower hospital resource burden.
机译:目标:比较1个月全因的风险,重大出血(MB)相关的和中风相关的入院和相关的医院资源使用和成本,以前为非衰弱性心房颤动(NVAF)和用华法林治疗, Rivaroxaban和Dabigatran与Apixaban。方法:从总理数据库中确定了在住院期间接受了NVAF(任何排放诊断职位)的成年病人(任何排放诊断职位),从总理数据库中确定了住院期间(2017年6月1日2013-30日1月1日)并分组为各自的队列。倾向得分匹配用于生成具有相似特性的群组。在回归中,评估了1个月内发生的入院的风险,并进行了相关的逗留时间(LOS)和成本。结果:NVAF含有华法林VS Apixaban的NVAF患者的所有原因风险大大(差距[或] = 1.05;置信区间[CI] = 1.02-1.08; p <.001),与MB相关的(或:1.28; CI:1.16-1.42; p <.001)和相关的行程(或:1.33; CI:1.11-1.58; p = .002)入伍;对于所有入院类别,平均LOS显着更长,对于华法林治疗患者的成本明显高。 NVAF患者用蓖麻毒素对齐的脂绦虫的风险大大提高了所有原因的风险(或:1.06; CI:1.02-1.09; P = .001)和MB相关的(或= 1.62; CI = 1.44-1.83; P <.001 )自述,但没有与中风相关的休息;对于MB相关的Readmissions,对于Rivaroxaban治疗的患者,平均LOS和成本更高。在Apixaban和Dabigatran队列之间没有观察到所有原因,与之相关和中风相关的入院风险的显着差异。结论:在这种回顾性真实世界分析NVAF患者中,Apixaban治疗与Warfarin或Rivaroxaban和降低医院资源负担的临床结果相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号