...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Royal Society. Mathematical, physical and engineering sciences >How to have more things by forgetting how to count them(dagger)
【24h】

How to have more things by forgetting how to count them(dagger)

机译:如何通过忘记如何计算它们(匕首)有更多的东西

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cohen's first model is a model of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory in which there is a Dedekind-finite set of real numbers, and it is perhaps the most famous model where the Axiom of Choice fails. We force over this model to add a function from this Dedekind-finite set to some infinite ordinal kappa. In the case that we force the function to be injective, it turns out that the resulting model is the same as adding kappa Cohen reals to the ground model, and that we have just added an enumeration of the canonical Dedekind-finite set. In the case where the function is merely surjective it turns out that we do not add any reals, sets of ordinals, or collapse any Dedekind-finite sets. This motivates the question if there is any combinatorial condition on a Dedekind-finite setAwhich characterises when a forcing will preserve its Dedekind-finiteness or not add new sets of ordinals. We answer this question in the case of 'Adding a Cohen subset' by presenting a varied list of conditions each equivalent to the preservation of Dedekind-finiteness. For example, 2(A)is extremally disconnected, or [A](
机译:科恩的第一个模型是Zermelo-Fraenkel集合理论的模型,其中有一个Dedekind-Unitite的实数集,也许是首选公理失败的最着名的模型。我们强制使用此模型,从而从该Defekind-Unitite设置为某种无限序数kappa。在我们强制函数的情况下,结果结果表明,结果模型与将Kappa Cohen Reals添加到地面模型中,并且我们刚刚添加了一个规范Dedekind-Unitite集的枚举。在函数仅仅是调查的情况下,事实证明我们不添加任何真实,ordinals,或折叠任何Dedekind-Unitite集。这是一个问题,如果在迫使迫使将保留其Depekind-Finitent或不添加新的ordinals时,则激发了一个关于Dedekind-Unitite SetaWhich的组合条件。我们在“添加COHEN子集”的情况下回答这个问题,通过呈现各种条件列表,相当于保存Defeekind-Finitentent。例如,2(a)是端身断开的,或者[a](<ω)是depekind-feilite。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号