...
首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital and disaster medicine : >Characterization of Interventional Studies of the Cholera Epidemic in Haiti
【24h】

Characterization of Interventional Studies of the Cholera Epidemic in Haiti

机译:海地霍乱疫情的介入研究表征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In October 2010, the Haitian Ministry of Public Health and Population (MSPP; Port au Prince, Haiti) reported a cholera epidemic caused by contamination of the Artibonite River by a United Nation Stabilization Mission camp. Interventional studies of the subsequent responses, including a descriptive Methods section and systematic approach, may be useful in facilitating comparisons and applying lessons learned to future outbreaks. The purpose of this study was to examine publicly available documents relating to the 2010 cholera outbreak to answer: (1) What information is publicly available on interventional studies conducted during the epidemic, and what was/were the impact(s)? and (2) Can the interventions be compared, and what lessons can be learned from their comparison?A PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, Maryland USA) search was conducted using the parameters “Haiti” and “cholera.” Studies were categorized as “interventional research,” “epidemiological research,” or “other.” A distinction was made between studies and narrative reports. The PubMed search yielded 171 papers, 59 (34.0%) of which were epidemiological and 12 (7.0%) were interventional studies. The remaining 100 papers (59.0%) comprised largely of narrative, anecdotal descriptions. An expanded examination of publications by the World Health Organization (WHO; Geneva, Switzerland), the Center for Research in the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED; Brussels, Belgium), United States Agency for International Development (USAID; Washington, DC USA)-Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC), and US National Library of Medicine’s (NLM; Bethesda, Maryland USA) Disaster Literature databases yielded no additional interventional studies. The unstructured formats and differing levels of detail prohibited comparisons between interventions, even between those with a similar approach. Only two (17.0%) interventional studies included any impact data, although neither commented whether the intervention improved health or reduced incidence or mortality related to cholera. Agreed frameworks for guiding responses and subsequent reporting are needed to ensure reports contain sufficient detail to draw conclusions for the definition of best practices and for the design of future interventions. Miller J , Birnbaum ML . Characterization of interventional studies of the cholera epidemic in Haiti. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(2):176–181.
机译:2010年10月,海地公共卫生和人口部(MSPP;奥地基港,海地)报告了由联合国稳定使命营地污染Artibonite河流的霍乱疫情。随后的反应的介入研究,包括描述性方法部分和系统方法,可用于促进与未来爆发的比较和应用经验教训。本研究的目的是审查与2010年霍乱爆发有关的公开文件,以回答:(1)在流行病中进行的介入研究公开可公开提供哪些信息,以及影响的介入研究? (2)可以比较干预措施,以及如何从他们的比较中了解哪些课程?一个PubMed(国家生物技术信息中心,国家健康机构; Bethesda,Maryland美国)搜索使用“海地”和“和”霍乱。”研究分为“介入研究”,“流行病学研究”或“其他”。研究和叙事报告之间的区别。 PubMed搜索产生了171篇论文,其中59名(34.0%)的流行病学和12(7.0%)是介入研究。其余100篇论文(59.0%)主要由叙事,轶事描述组成。由世界卫生组织(Geneva,Switzerland),灾害流行病学研究中心的扩大审查(Geneva,Switzerland)(可靠;布鲁塞尔,比利时),美国国际发展局(USAID;华盛顿特区美国) - 开发经验清算室(DEC)和美国国家医学图书馆(NLM;贝塞斯达,马里兰州美国)灾害文献数据库没有额外的介入研究。非结构化格式和不同的细节水平禁止干预措施之间的比较,即使在具有类似方法的人之间。只有两项(17.0%)的介入研究包括任何影响数据,尽管既没有评论干预是否改善了与霍乱相关的健康或发病率或死亡率。需要一致的引导响应和随后报告的框架,以确保报告包含足够的细节,以得出结论,以得出最佳做法的定义和未来干预的设计。米勒J,Birnbaum ml。海地霍乱疫情介入研究的特征。 Prehosp灾难Med。 2018; 33(2):176-181。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号