...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Inefficiencies of over-screening and under-screening for cervical cancer prevention in the US
【24h】

Inefficiencies of over-screening and under-screening for cervical cancer prevention in the US

机译:过度筛选和筛查美国宫颈癌预防的效率低下

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There is limited information on the cost-inefficiencies of non-adherence to recommended cervical cancer screening or the potential value for improving non-adherence. We estimated the incremental value of adhering to recommended screening every three years with cytology, using a disease simulation model that integrated real-world screening practice data from New Mexico. The amount that can be spent to improve adherence was estimated by calculating the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) under scenarios of Current Practice (assuming a population of mixed adherence) and Uniformly Non-Adherent populations with imperfect or perfect adherence to follow-up of screen-positive women. Getting unscreened women screened every three years by cytology was a better value than increasing screening in the under-screened or reducing screening in the over-screened. For example, INMBs were $3998 for screening previously unscreened women versus $136 for eliminating annual screening at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Strategies to reach unscreened women are potentially high-value investments.
机译:有关非依赖性成本低效率的信息有限的信息,以推荐的宫颈癌筛查或改善非粘附性的潜在价值。我们估计使用细胞学中每三年遵守推荐筛选的增量值,使用综合来自新墨西哥州的真实筛查实践数据的疾病模拟模型。通过在当前实践的情景下计算增量净货币福利(符合混合申请人群)和统一的非依赖性人群,估计可以花费以改善遵守的金额估计,并且具有不完美或完美遵守后续行动的屏幕阳性女性。通过细胞学进行每三年筛选的未筛选的女性是一个更好的值,而不是在过度筛选的筛选中增加筛查。例如,inmbs为3998美元用于筛选先前未屏蔽的妇女,而不是136美元,以便在每年调整每年100,000美元的愿意支付阈值的情况下消除年度筛查。达到未屏蔽妇女的策略是潜在的高价值投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号