首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Double jeopardy: Predictors of elevated lethality risk among intimate partner violence victims seen in emergency departments
【24h】

Double jeopardy: Predictors of elevated lethality risk among intimate partner violence victims seen in emergency departments

机译:双重危险:致命伴侣暴力受害者在急诊部门中看到的致命危险预测因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many intimate partner homicide victims visit emergency departments (EDs) prior to their deaths, yet their lethality risk is notwell understood. eHealth interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) improve provider information, tailor care to victim need and link victims to services. We analyzed ED patients' lethality risk using one such intervention, Domestic Violence Report and Referral (DVRR). DVRR records were assessed for 263 female patients aged 16 and older seen for IPV at an urban, high-traffic, Northern California ED in 2014-15. Multiple linear regression was used to test the association of children's presence at home, pregnancy, age, and abuser-victim relationship with victim's lethality risk using the Danger Assessment (DA) score from the Lethality Risk Assessment for Intimate Partner Femicide. Differences in means were assessed using t- and F-tests. The mean DA score indicated high lethality risk, with a third of respondents (33.1%) reporting very high DA scores. Multiple linear regression models indicated that increasing victim age (beta=0.20/year; 95% CI: 0.11-0.29), children's presence at home (beta=2.61, 95% CI: 0.63-4.58), and perpetrator reported as dating partner (beta=4.50, 95% CI: 1.62-7.38) or ex-partner (beta=4.38, 95% CI: 1.10-7.66) were significantly associated with the DA score (p < 0.05). Use of DA scores as ED risk assessment tools in response to IPV victimization could help hospital staff and IPV advocates direct resources toward highest-need patients, improving health outcomes without additional burden on hospitals. These results also foreground eHealth interventions' utility in linking providers and IPV advocates and reducing the risk of intimate partner homicide. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:许多亲密的合作伙伴凶杀案受害者在死亡之前访问急诊部门(EDS),但他们的致命风险并不了解。亲密合作伙伴暴力的电子健康干预(IPV)改善提供商信息,定制对受害者需求并将受害者联系起来的服务。我们使用一种这样的干预,家庭暴力报告和转诊(DVRR)分析了ED患者的致死性风险。在2014 - 15年15年在城市,高速公路北加州北部的IPV中看到的263名女性患者的263名女性患者进行了评估了DVRR记录。多种线性回归用于测试儿童在家庭,怀孕,年龄和施警与受害者风险与受害者风险与受害者的致命危险的关系的关联,从杀伤性伴侣剪影的致命危险评估中得分。使用T-和F-Tests评估手段的差异。平均da得分表示高致命的风险,其中三分之一的受访者(33.1%)报告非常高的DA分数。多元线性回归模型表明,增加受害者年龄(β= 0.20 /年; 95%CI:0.11-0.29),儿童在家里的存在(BETA = 2.61,95%CI:0.63-4.58)和犯罪者报告为约会伙伴( β= 4.50,95%CI:1.62-7.38)或ex-Partn(β= 4.38,95%CI:1.10-7.66)与DA分数显着相关(P <0.05)。以IPV受害者为ED风险评估工具使用DA分数可以帮助医院工作人员和IPV倡导最高需求的患者,改善医院额外负担的健康成果。这些结果还有前景eHealth干预的效用,将提供者和IPV倡导者联系起来并降低亲密合作伙伴凶杀案的风险。 (c)2017年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号