...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Shared use agreements between municipalities and public schools in the United States, 2014
【24h】

Shared use agreements between municipalities and public schools in the United States, 2014

机译:美国城市和公立学校之间的共同使用协议,2014年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shared use agreements allow public use of school facilities during non-school hours. Such agreements can cover outdoor facilities alone or may be more comprehensive by also including indoor facilities. Our aim was to: 1) estimate the prevalence of shared use agreements and facility types coveredamong U. S. municipalities and 2) identify differences in prevalence by municipality characteristics. The 2014 National Survey of Community-based Policy and Environmental Supports for Healthy Eating and Active Living is a representative survey of US municipalities (n=2029). Data were analyzed using surveyweights to create national estimates. Logistic and multinomial regression models determined odds ratios adjusting for municipality characteristics. Among 1930 municipalities with a school, 41.6% had a shared use agreement as reported by a local official, 45.6% did not, and 12.8% did not know. Significant differences in prevalence existed by population size, rural/ urban status, poverty prevalence, median education level, and census region; however, after adjustment for other municipality characteristics significant differences remained only by population size, median education level, and census region. Among municipalities with a shared use agreement, 59.6% covered both outdoor and indoor facilities, 5.5% covered indoor facilities only, and 34.9% covered outdoor facilities only. Opportunities exist to expand the use of shared use agreements particularly in municipalities with small populations, lower education levels, and in the South, and to promote more comprehensive shared use agreements that include both indoor and outdoor facilities. Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:共享使用协议允许在非上课时间公开使用学校设施。此类协议可以单独覆盖户外设施,也可以更全面地包括室内设施。我们的宗旨是:1)估计共享使用协议和设施类型覆盖的葡萄座,5)的普遍存在,识别市政府特征的普遍性的差异。 2014年全国对健康饮食和积极生活的基于社区的政策和环境支持的调查是对美国市政当局的代表性调查(n = 2029)。使用调查重量来分析数据来创建国家估计数。物流和多项式回归模型确定为市政特征调整的差距比率。在1930年与学校的城市中,41.6%有一份当地官员报告的共同使用协议,45.6%没有,12.8%不知道。人口大小,农村/城市地位,贫困,中位教育水平和人口普查区存在显着差异。但是,在调整其他市政特征后,只有人口规模,中位数教育水平和人口普查区域才留下显着差异。共用使用协议的市内,户外设施59.6%,仅限5.5%的室内设施,仅限34.9%覆盖户外设施。存在的机会,以扩大利用共享使用协议,特别是在具有小人口,降低教育水平和南方的市内,并促进包括室内和室外设施的更全面的共享使用协议。 elsevier公司发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号