...
【24h】

The evidence base for breast cancer screening.

机译:乳腺癌筛查的证据基础。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The history of breast cancer screening is littered with controversy. With 10 trials spanning 4 decades, we have a substantial body of evidence, but with different aims and flaws. Combined analysis of the intention-to-treat results gives an overall relative reduction in breast cancer mortality of 19% (95% CI 12%-26%), which, if adjusted for non-attendance gives an approximate 25% relative reduction for those who attend screening. However, given that 4% of all-cause mortality is due to breast cancer deaths, this translates into a less than 1% reduction in all-cause mortality. An emerging issue in interpretation is the improvements in treatment since these trials recruited women. Modern systemic therapy would have improved survival (models suggest between 12% and 21%) in both screened and non-screened groups, which would result in a lesser difference in absolute risk reduction from screening but probably a similar, or slightly smaller, relative risk reduction. However benefits and harms, particularly over-diagnosis, need to balanced and differ by age-groups. The informed views of recipients of screening are needed to guide current and future policy on screening.
机译:乳腺癌筛查的历史涉及争议。随着4个十年的10个试验,我们有一个实质性的证据,但不同的目标和缺陷。综合分析意向治疗结果具有19%(95%CI 12%-26%)的乳腺癌死亡率的总体相对降低,如果不考勤调整,那么近似的25%的相对减少谁参加筛选。然而,鉴于4%的全因死亡率是由于乳腺癌死亡,这转化为全导致死亡率降低的不到1%。解释中的新兴问题是自从这些试验征募妇女的治疗方面的改善。现代全身疗法将改善筛查和非筛选组中的生存率(模型建议12%和21%之间),这将导致从筛选中的绝对风险降低的差异较小,但可能类似或略小的相对风险减少。然而,益处和危害,特别是过度诊断,需要平衡和不同年龄组的差异。需要对筛选者接受者的明智意见,以指导在筛查时的当前和未来的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号