首页> 外文期刊>Primary health care research & development >Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
【24h】

Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective

机译:衡量代理初级医疗团队的表现:了解团队的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. Background: Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models. Methods: A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question. Findings: A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30).
机译:目的:该研究的目的是描述在侦探初级卫生保健团队中支持合作的实践,并确定从侦查卫生提供者的角度来衡量衡量这一合作的影响的绩效指标。背景:尽管在加拿大实施的思想初级保健模型的竞争激增,但几乎没有证据表明原卫生保健团队的预期结果是否已经实现。部分挑战是确定可以展示协作关怀价值的最合适的措施。迄今为止,关于来自提供者的绩效测量似乎很少遗为遗体,从而有助于思想初级保健团队的协作护理过程。从一系列纪律背景中提供有助于发展绩效措施的供应商可以帮助确定最相关的措施,以证明对思想初级保健模式的预期结果的协同关怀的价值。方法:定性学;一部分更大的混合方法发育评估,以检查思想初级保健小组的绩效衡量。利益攸关方研讨会是在加拿大安大略省省的一年一度协会会议上进行的一年一度的协会会议。引导六个问题在工作表和翻转图表上记录了研讨会组和参与者的反应。收集所有响应并将逐字进入单词文档。每个问题都适用了定性分析策略。调查结果:共有283名卫生保健提供者,来自14名卫生专业的卫生专业,在贸易专业卫生保健团队参加。侦查协作的前三个元素(总n = 628)是通信(n = 146),共同治疗(n = 112)和基于患者的会议(n = 81)。目前用于展示侦查协作的价值的前三名性能指标(总N = 241)是患者体验(n = 71),患者健康状况(n = 35)和团队推荐(n = 30)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号