...
首页> 外文期刊>Perception >Final Sampling Bias in Haptic Judgments: How Final Touch Affects Decision-Making
【24h】

Final Sampling Bias in Haptic Judgments: How Final Touch Affects Decision-Making

机译:触觉判断中的最终抽样偏见:最终触摸如何影响决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When people make a choice between multiple items, they usually evaluate each item one after the other repeatedly. The effect of the order and number of evaluating items on one's choices is essential to understanding the decision-making process. Previous studies have shown that when people choose a favorable item from two items, they tend to choose the item that they evaluated last. This tendency has been observed regardless of sensory modalities. This study investigated the origin of this bias by using three experiments involving two-alternative forced-choice tasks using handkerchiefs. First, the bias appeared in a smoothness discrimination task, which indicates that the bias was not based on judgments of preference. Second, the handkerchief that was touched more often tended to be chosen more frequently in the preference task, but not in the smoothness discrimination task, indicating that a mere exposure effect enhanced the bias. Third, in the condition where the number of touches did not differ between handkerchiefs, the bias appeared when people touched a handkerchief they wanted to touch last, but not when people touched the handkerchief that was predetermined. This finding suggests a direct coupling between final voluntary touching and judgment.
机译:当人们在多个项目之间做出选择时,他们通常反复地在另一个项目之后评估每个项目。评估项目对一个人选择的命令和数量的影响对于了解决策过程至关重要。以前的研究表明,当人们从两件物品中选择有利的物品时,他们倾向于选择最后评估的项目。无论感官模式如何,都观察到这种趋势。本研究通过使用使用手帕的三项实验研究了这一偏差的起源。首先,偏差出现在平滑度辨别任务中,这表明偏差不是基于偏好的判断。其次,在偏好任务中更频繁地触摸的手帕更常常被选为,但不是在平滑度辨别任务中,表明仅仅曝光效果增强了偏差。第三,在手帕之间没有差异的情况下,当人们触动他们想要触摸的手帕时,偏见出现了偏见,但是当人们触动预先确定的手帕时,而不是当人们触动的手帕时。这一发现表明,最终自愿触摸和判断之间的直接耦合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号