...
首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study
【24h】

Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study

机译:与联系紧急救护服务服务的患者的结果并没有运送到急诊部门:数据联系研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Emergency ambulance services do not transport all patients to hospital. International literature reports non-transport rates ranging from 3.7-93.7%. In 2017, 38% of the 11 million calls received by ambulance services in England were attended by ambulance but not transported to an Emergency Department (ED). A further 10% received clinical advice over the telephone. Little is known about what happens to patients following a non-transport decision. We aimed to investigate what happens to patients following an emergency ambulance telephone call that resulted in a non-transport decision, using a linked routine data-set. Methods: Six-months individual patient level data from one ambulance service in England, linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and national mortality data, were used to identify subsequent health events (ambulance re-contact, ED attendance, hospital admission, death) within 3 days (primary analysis) and 7 days (secondary analysis) of an ambulance call ending in non-transport to hospital. Non-clinical staff used a priority dispatch system e.g. Medical Priority Dispatch System to prioritize calls for ambulance dispatch. Non-transport to ED was determined by ambulance crew members at scene or clinicians at the emergency operating center when an ambulance was not dispatched (telephone advice). Results: The data linkage rate was 85% for patients who were discharged at scene (43,108/50,894). After removal of deaths associated with end of life care (N = 312), 9% (3,861/42,796) re-contacted the ambulance service, 12.6% (5,412/42,796) attended ED, 6.3% (2,694/42,796) were admitted to hospital, and 0.3% (129/42,796) died within 3 days of the call. Rates were higher for events occurring within 7 days. For example, 12% re-contacted the ambulance service, 16.1% attended ED, 9.3% were admitted to hospital, and 0.5% died. The linkage rate for telephone advice calls was low because ambulance services record less information about these patients (24% 2,514/10,634). A sensitivity analysis identified a range of subsequent event rates: 2.5-10.5% of patients were admitted to hospital and 0.06-0.24% of patient died within 3 days of the call. Conclusions: Most non-transported patients did not have subsequent health events. Deaths after non-transport are an infrequent event that could be selected for more detailed review of individual cases, to facilitate learning and improvement.
机译:目标:紧急救护车服务不将所有患者运送到医院。国际文学报告的非运输利率范围从3.7-93.7%。 2017年,英格兰救护车服务收到的38%呼吁是由救护车出席但未运送给急诊部(ED)。另外10%通过电话接受了临床建议。众所周知,在非运输决定后患者会发生什么。我们的旨在使用链接的例程数据集来调查患者遵循患者患者患者的患者会发生什么。方法:在3天内,六个月与医院统计数据和国家死亡率数据联系在一起,与医院统计数据和国家死亡率数据有关的一个救护车服务,与医院统计数据和国家死亡率数据相关联(初级分析)和7天(二次分析)以非运输到医院结尾的救护车呼叫。非临床人员使用优先发行系统。医疗优先级调度系统,优先考虑救护车派遣。当救护车未派出(电话咨询)时,应由救护车的现场或临床医生的救护车船员或临床医生确定非运输。结果:在现场出院的患者(43,108 / 50,894),数据联动率为85%。除去与生命关注的结束相关的死亡(n = 312),9%(3,861 / 42,796)重新联系救护车服务,12.6%(5,412 / 42,796)出席了ed,6.3%(2,694 / 42,796)被录取医院,0.3%(129 / 42,796)在电话的3天内死亡。 7天内发生的事件率较高。例如,12%重新联系救护车服务,16.1%出席艾德,9.3%入院,0.5%死亡。电话咨询呼叫的联系率低,因为救护车服务记录了有关这些患者的信息更少(24%2,514 / 10,634)。敏感性分析确定了一系列后续事件税率:2.5-10.5%的患者入院,0.06-0.24%的患者在呼叫的3天内死亡。结论:大多数未运输的患者没有随后的健康事件。非运输后的死亡是一个不常见的事件,可以选择更详细的个人案件审查,以促进学习和改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号