首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Neighborhood Poverty and 9-1-1 Ambulance Contacts
【24h】

Neighborhood Poverty and 9-1-1 Ambulance Contacts

机译:邻里贫困和9-1-1救护车联系人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Neighborhood poverty is positively associated with frequency of 9-1-1 ambulance utilization, but it is unclear whether this association remains significant when accounting for variations in the severities and types of ambulance contacts. Methods: We merged EMS ambulance contact records in a single California county (n = 88,027) with data from the American Community Survey at the census tract level (n = 300). Using tract as a proxy for neighborhood and negative binomial regression as an analytical tool, we predicted 16 outcomes: any ambulance contacts, ambulance contacts stratified by three intervention severities, and ambulance contacts varied by 12 primary impression categories. For each model, we estimated the incident rate ratios for 10 percentage point increases in tract-level poverty while controlling for geographic patterns in race, citizenship, gender, age, emergency department proximity, population density, and population size. Results: Our study produced three major findings. First, tract-level poverty was positively associated with ambulance contacts (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34 to 1.57). Second, poverty was positively associated with low severity contacts (IRR 1.48; 95% CI 1.35 to 1.61), medium severity contacts (IRR 1.38; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.49), and high severity contacts (IRR 1.40; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.51). Third, poverty was positively associated with 12 primary impression categories: abdominal (IRR 1.48; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.61), altered level of consciousness (IRR 1.37; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.50), cardiac (IRR 1.28; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.42), overdose/intoxication (IRR 1.59; 95% CI 1.40 to 1.81), pain (IRR 1.56; 95% CI 1.41 to 1.73), psych/behavioral (IRR 1.50; 95% CI 1.34 to 1.67), respiratory (IRR 1.42; 95% CI 1.29 to 1.56) seizure (IRR 1.52; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.68), stroke (IRR 1.14; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.28), syncope/near syncope (IRR 1.23; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.36), trauma (IRR 1.44; 95% CI 1.31 to 1.58), and general weakness (IRR 1.31; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.42). Conclusion: Our study suggests poverty is a positive, strong, and enduring predictor of ambulance contacts at the neighborhood level. The relationship between neighborhood poverty and ambulance utilization should be considered at multiple levels of EMS decision making
机译:背景:邻里贫困与9-1-1救护车利用率的频率正相关,但尚不清楚这种关联在核对救护车联系人的剪切和类型的变化时仍然重要。方法:我们将EMS救护车联络记录合并在一个加州县(N = 88,027)中,并在人口普查道等上,来自美国社区调查的数据(n = 300)。使用道路作为邻域和负二项式回归作为分析工具的代理,我们预测了16个结果:任何救护车触点,三个干预较严重性分层的救护触点,以及12个主要印象类别的救护车触点。对于每种型号,我们估计了10个百分点的事故率比散级贫困增加了10个百分点,同时控制了种族,公民身份,性别,年龄,急诊部门,人口密度和人口规模的地理模式。结果:我们的研究制作了三个主要结果。首先,道级贫困与救护车触点正相关(入射率比[IRR] 1.45; 95%置信区间[CI] 1.34至1.57)。其次,贫困与低严重程度触点呈正相关(IRR 1.48; 95%CI 1.35至1.61),中等严重性触点(FRIT 1.38; 95%CI 1.28至1.49),以及高严重程度触点(IRR 1.40; 95%CI 1.30至95%CI 1.30 1.51)。第三,贫困与12个主要印象类别呈正相关:腹部(IRR 1.48; 95%CI 1.36至1.61),意识水平改变(IRR 1.37; 95%CI 1.25至1.50),心脏(FRIER 1.28; 95%CI 1.14到1.42),过量/中毒(FRIT 1.59; 95%CI 1.40至1.81),疼痛(FRIR 1.56; 95%CI 1.41至1.73),呼吸/行为(FRIT 1.50; 95%CI 1.34至1.67),呼吸(IRR 1.42; 95%CI 1.29至1.56)癫痫发作(IRR 1.52; 95%CI 1.38至1.68),中风(IRR 1.14; 95%CI 1.01至1.28),晕厥/近晕圈(IRR 1.23; 95%CI 1.12至1.36) ,创伤(IRR1.44; 95%CI 1.31至1.58),以及一般弱点(IRR 1.31; 95%CI 1.20至1.42)。结论:我们的研究表明贫困是邻里级别的救护车联系人的积极,强大,持久的预测因素。在多级EMS决策中应考虑邻里贫困和救护车利用的关系

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号