...
首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >Ultrasound‐guided dorsal penile nerve block vs neurostimulator‐guided pudendal nerve block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A prospective, randomized, double‐blinded trial
【24h】

Ultrasound‐guided dorsal penile nerve block vs neurostimulator‐guided pudendal nerve block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A prospective, randomized, double‐blinded trial

机译:超声引导的背侧阴茎神经阻滞与患有次孢子瘤外科的儿童中的神经刺激剂引导的泛穴神经障碍:一种预期,随机,双盲试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background and Aims Hypospadias is a common congenital malformation in pediatric patients. Surgical repair of this malformation is a painful procedure and has long‐term effects. Pudendal and penile nerve blocks are commonly preferred techniques for maintaining postoperative analgesia. However, the conventional landmark‐based penile block technique involves numerous potential complications and provides a shorter analgesic period compared to the pudendal block. A promising ultrasound‐guided dorsal penile nerve block was recently described. We aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound‐guided penile nerve block with that of neurostimulator‐guided pudendal nerve block. Method Thirty‐three patients aged 1‐7?years were included in this prospective, double‐blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were divided into two groups and received either ultrasound‐guided dorsal penile nerve block or neurostimulator‐guided pudendal nerve block. All blocks were performed by the same two anesthesiologists, and the same surgeons performed the surgical procedures. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale was used for postoperative pain management. The primary outcome of the study was time to first analgesic requirement. Secondary outcomes were FLACC scores at different time points, and types and cumulative doses of analgesic drugs. Results Dorsal penile nerve block provided longer analgesia than pudendal nerve block (32.29?±?5.47?hours and 21.13?±?3.53?hours, respectively; differences in mean: 11.16, 95% CI: 7.873‐14.465) ( P ??.001). FLACC scores at the time of first analgesic requirement were significantly lower in dorsal penile nerve block group than pudendal nerve block group (median [IQR]: 2 [2‐2.5] and 3 [3‐5], respectively; differences in median: ?1, 95% CI: ?1.851 to ?0.149) ( P ??.001). Conclusion Ultrasound‐guided dorsal penile nerve block provided a longer analgesic period and reduced opioid consumption compared to neurostimulator‐guided pudendal nerve block.
机译:抽象背景和目标腹盆是儿科患者的常见先天性畸形。这种畸形的手术修复是一种痛苦的程序,并且具有长期影响。 pudendal和阴茎神经块是维持术后镇痛的优选技术。然而,传统的基于地标的阴茎块技术涉及许多潜在的并发症,并与泛建块相比提供更短的镇痛期。最近描述了有希望的超声引导的背阴性阴茎神经块。我们旨在比较超声引导的阴茎神经块与神经刺激性引导的硫态神经块的镇痛效果。方法三十三名患者1-7岁以下的患者纳入这一前瞻性,双盲,随机对照试验中。患者分为两组,并接受超声引导的背侧阴茎神经嵌段或神经刺激器引导的硫磺神经块。所有块由同一两个麻醉学家进行,并且相同的外科医生进行了外科手术。面部,腿部,活动,哭泣和合理(FLACC)规模用于术后疼痛管理。研究的主要结果是第一次镇痛要求的时间。二次结果在不同时间点的FLACC评分,以及类型和累积剂量的镇痛药物。结果背侧阴茎神经块提供的镇痛长度镇痛而不是疏水阀(32.29?±5.47?小时和21.13?±3.53?小时;差异意味着:11.16,95%CI:7.873-14.465)(P?& ?.001)。在第一次镇痛要求时的FLACC分数显着低于pudendal神经嵌段组(中位数[IQR]:2 [2-2.5]和3 [3-5];中位数的差异:? 1,95%CI:α1.851至0.149)(p≤≤001)。结论超声引导的背侧阴茎神经块提供了较长的镇痛时期,与神经刺激器引导的泛神经块相比,镇痛期减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号