首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >Work of breathing for cuffed and uncuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes in an in?vitro lung model setting
【24h】

Work of breathing for cuffed and uncuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes in an in?vitro lung model setting

机译:在体外肺模型设置中呼吸袖口和遮瑕儿科气管内管的工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Background Over the last decade, cuffed endotracheal tubes are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia and also in pediatric intensive care. However, the smaller inner diameter of cuffed endotracheal tubes and, implicitly, the increased endotracheal tube resistance is still a matter of debate. Aims This in?vitro study investigated work of breathing and inspiratory airway pressures in cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes and the impact of pressure support ventilation and automatic tube compensation. Methods In 5 simulated neonatal and pediatric lung models, the Active Servo Lung 5000 and an intensive care ventilator were used to quantify the differences in work of breathing under spontaneous breathing (with and without pressure support ventilation and automatic tube compensation) between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes. Additionally, differences in inspiratory airway pressures, measured either proximal or distal of the endotracheal tube, between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes under mechanical ventilation were investigated. Results Work of breathing was overall 10.27% [95% confidence interval 9.01‐11.94] higher with cuffed than with uncuffed endotracheal tubes and was dramatically reduced by 34.19% [95% confidence interval 31.61‐35.25] with the application of pressure support. Automatic tube compensation almost diminished work of breathing differences between the 2 endotracheal tube types in nearly all pediatric lung models. Peak inspiratory and mean airway pressures measured at the proximal endotracheal tube end revealed significantly higher values in cuffed than in uncuffed endotracheal tubes. However, these differences measured at the distal end of the endotracheal tube became minimal. Conclusion This in?vitro study confirmed significant differences in work of breathing and inspiratory pressures between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes. Work of breathing, however, is almost neutralized by pressure support ventilation with automatic tube compensation and distal inspiratory airway pressures that, from a clinical perspective, are not significantly increased.
机译:摘要背景在过去十年中,袖扣气管管越来越多地用于儿科麻醉以及儿科重症监护。然而,柔软的气管膜管的内径较小,隐含地,增加的气管导管抗性仍然是辩论的问题。目的这在玻璃体体外研究中的呼吸和吸气气道压力的研究中的呼吸和吸气气管压力和压力支撑通气和自动管补偿的影响。方法在5种模拟新生儿和儿科肺模型中,活性伺服肺5000和密集的护理呼吸机用于量化在自发呼吸(带有且无压力支撑通气和自动管补偿)下呼吸工作的差异在袖扣和遮盖的气管内管。另外,研究了在机械通气下的袖带和Unckneaveab型管之间测量的吸气气道压力的差异,测得的气管导管之间的近端或远端。结果呼吸的工作总体而言,袖扣总体上为10.27%[95%置信区间9.01-11.94],而不是柔软的气管内管,并且随着压力支持的施用显着降低了34.19%[95%置信区间31.61-35.25]。自动管补偿几乎所有儿科肺模型中的2个子室管类型之间呼吸差异的几乎减少。在近端气管导管末端测量的峰值吸气和平均气道压力显示出袖带的显着较高的值,而不是在Uncupted气管内管中。然而,在气管内管的远端测量的这些差异变得最小。结论在体外研究中证实了呼吸和Unfupted气管膜之间的呼吸和吸气压力工作的显着差异。然而,呼吸的工作几乎是通过压力支持通风,自动管补偿和远端吸气气道压力从临床角度来看,不显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号