...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy theory and practice >Restoring physical function after knee replacement: a cross sectional comparison of progressive strengthening vs standard physical therapy
【24h】

Restoring physical function after knee replacement: a cross sectional comparison of progressive strengthening vs standard physical therapy

机译:膝关节后恢复物理功能:渐进式加强对标准物理治疗的横截面比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the functional status of patients 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who underwent progressive strengthening or standard of care rehabilitation to older adults without knee joint pain. Methods: This cross-sectional design study included 165 participants in the progressive strengthening group, 40 participants in the standard of care group, and 88 older adults (control group). The Knee Outcome Survey - Activity of Daily Living, knee active range of motion (ROM), quadriceps strength, and performance tests were compared between groups using a one-way ANOVA. The proportions of participants in both TKA groups who achieved the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the control group were compared using a Fisher's exact test. Results: Significant between-group effects were found for all variables (p < 0.001). The control group had better outcomes than both the progressive strengthening and standard of care groups (p < 0.001). Compared to the standard of care group, a higher proportion of participants in the progressive strengthening group achieved the lower bound cutoff for active knee extension ROM (p = 0.042), quadriceps strength (p = 0.032), and stair climbing time (p = 0.029). Conclusion: More participants in the progressive strengthening group had physical function that was similar to the healthy control group, when compared to the standard of care group. Progressive strengthening rehabilitation may be more effective in restoring normative levels of function after TKA than standard of care.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较膝盖关节置换术(TKA)后12个月的患者的功能状态,他们接受了逐步加强或对老年人的护理康复标准,没有膝关节疼痛。方法:这种横截面设计研究包括165名参与者在逐步加强集团,40名参与者中的40名参与者,以及88名老年人(对照组)。在使用单向ANOVA的组之间比较了膝关节成果调查 - 日常生活活动,膝关节主动运动范围,QuadRiceps强度和性能测试。使用Fisher的确切测试比较了实现对照组95%置信区间下限的TKA群体中的参与者的比例。结果:对所有变量发现组效应显着(P <0.001)。对照组具有比逐步加强和护理群标准的更好的结果(P <0.001)。与护理标准相比,渐进式加强组中的参与者比例较高,实现了活跃的膝关系延伸ROM的下限截止(P = 0.042),QuadRiceps强度(P = 0.032)和阶梯爬升时间(P = 0.029 )。结论:与护理标准相比,渐进式加强组中的更多参与者与健康对照组相似的物理功能。逐步加强康复可能在TKA后恢复规范性功能水平而不是护理标准更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号