...
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Endoluminal ultrasonography before retrograde endopyelotomy: can the results match laparoscopic pyeloplasty?
【24h】

Endoluminal ultrasonography before retrograde endopyelotomy: can the results match laparoscopic pyeloplasty?

机译:逆行内膜切开术前的腔内超声检查:结果可以匹配腹腔镜肾盂成形术吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, the authors assess whether endoluminal ultrasonography is helpful when carried out before retrograde endopyelotomy, and ask whether it can help to produce results comparable to laparoscopic pyeloplasty. They found that endopyelotomy was not as good in the presence of crossing vessels, despite using endoluminal ultrasonography, and they propose that laparoscopic pyeloplasty should be used in this situation. OBJECTIVE: To present the results of endopyelotomy using endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS) to identify crossing vessels, as the success rates of endopyelotomy are generally lower than pyeloplasty, especially in patients with crossing vessels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients who underwent EUS before a planned retrograde endopyelotomy were analysed retrospectively. EUS was used to direct the endopyelotomy incision for patients with crossing vessels. Treatment was considered successful if the patient was asymptomatic and unobstructed or improved on renography. The results were compared to those from 18 patients treated by laparoscopic pyeloplasty, some of whom had undergone EUS. RESULTS: Crossing vessels were identified in 27 of the 41 patients (66%). Primary treatment consisted of endopyelotomy for 26 patients and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for 15. The overall success rate for 24 endopyelotomy patients with an adequate follow-up (mean 19 months) was 71%, with more success in patients with no crossing vessels (11 of 13 (85%) vs six of 11 (55%)). Of the 18 patients treated by laparoscopic pyeloplasty (mean follow-up 15.1 months) 17 were successful. CONCLUSION: The results for endopyelotomy were disappointing in patients with crossing vessels, despite using EUS. The results suggest that patients with crossing vessels should be treated by laparoscopic pyeloplasty. More data are needed to compare endopyelotomy with laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with no crossing vessels.
机译:在本文中,作者评估了在进行逆行肾内膜切开术之前进行腔内超声检查是否有帮助,并询问它是否可以帮助产生与腹腔镜肾盂成形术相当的结果。他们发现,尽管使用了腔内超声检查,但在存在交叉血管的情况下,内窥镜切开术并不理想,并且他们建议在这种情况下应使用腹腔镜肾盂成形术。目的:使用腔内超声(EUS)进行内膜切开术以鉴定交叉血管的结果,因为内膜切开术的成功率通常低于肾盂成形术,特别是在有交叉血管的患者中。病人和方法:回顾性分析了连续41例在计划的逆行肾内膜切开术之前接受EUS的患者。 EUS用于指导有交叉血管的患者的内膜切开术切口。如果患者无症状且肾盂造影无障碍或好转,则认为治疗成功。将结果与18例经腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗的患者进行了比较,其中一些患者接受了EUS。结果:41例患者中有27例(66%)发现交叉血管。主要治疗方法包括26例行内窥镜切开术和15例进行腹腔镜肾盂成形术。24例经充分随访(平均19个月)的内窥镜切开术患者的总成功率为71%,在无血管交叉的患者中获得更大的成功(13例中的11例) (85%)对比11中的六个(55%)。经腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗的18例患者(平均随访15.1个月)中有17例成功。结论:尽管使用了超声内镜,但对于有血管交叉的患者,内膜切开术的结果令人失望。结果表明,应通过腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗横穿血管的患者。没有交叉血管的患者需要更多的数据来比较内膜切开术与腹腔镜肾盂成形术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号