首页> 外文期刊>Polish journal of ecology >Predation on artificial nests imitating the broods of two rallid species: the influence of habitat features
【24h】

Predation on artificial nests imitating the broods of two rallid species: the influence of habitat features

机译:人工巢穴的捕食模仿两种rallid种类的巢穴:栖息地特征的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We tested the influence of nest concealment (vegetation type, density and height), water depth and nest distance from the bank on predation rates upon simulated nests of the water rail (Rallus aquaticus) and the little crake (Porzana parva). Broods of both rallids were simulated by real and wax-filled quail (Coturnix coturnix) eggs coloured typically for each species. Three grades of nest concealment were used: uncovered nests located on wooden floating boards, nests hidden in littoral vegetation and nests hidden under a plastic mesh covered with plants, which made them invisible from the air. Concealment proved to have a stronger impact on the fate of artificial nests than water depth; 95% of the nests on boards were depredated after one week of exposure. Nests attached to a peg at water level and hidden in vegetation had survival rates of 18 and 22%, after three weeks of exposure in two experiment repetitions. In 2012, we found significant differences between survival rates of nests located in different types of vegetation after the first week of the experiment: nests in bulrush (Typha spp.) had a higher survival rate than nests in sedge (Carex spp.) and common reed (Phragmites australis), and nests in sedge had a better survival rate than nests in reed. Those differences disappeared after the end of the experiment. In 2013, nests located in sedge (Carex spp.) had a better survival rate than nests located in bulrush (Typha spp.) or the common reed (Phragmites australis). Covering nests with plastic mesh and plants increased nest survival up to 38% after a three-week-long exposure period. Potential nest predators were monitored: mammals (mustelids and rodents) using live traps and birds by observation of their hunting activity. Filling quail eggshells with wax allowed us to identify the marsh harrier (Circus aeruginosus) as the main nest predator - in 67% of depredated nests, wax eggs carried marks of a raptor beak. American mink (Neovison vison) and the water vole (Arvicola amhibius), though abundant in the study area, were not important nest predators, as only a few bite marks of these mammals were recorded.
机译:我们测试了在水铁路(Rallus Aquaticus)的模拟巢穴上与捕食率的鸟类隐藏(植被类型,密度和高度),水深和巢距离的影响。通过通常针对每个物种的真实和蜡填充的鹌鹑(CoTurnix CoTurnix)鸡蛋模拟了两种rallids的巢穴。使用了三种巢穴隐藏:位于木浮板上的未覆盖的巢穴,隐藏在沿海植被的巢穴和隐藏在植物覆盖的塑料网上的巢穴,这使得它们从空中看不见。被证明对人造巢穴的命运被证明是强烈的影响;在接触一周后,95%的船上巢被剥夺。在两次实验重复后三周之后,在水位上附着在水位上并隐藏在植被中并隐藏在植被中的巢穴的存活率为18%和22%。 2012年,我们发现在实验的第一周后,我们发现位于不同类型植被的巢穴的生存率有显着差异:釜中巢(Typha SPP。)的存活率高于莎草(Carex SPP)的巢穴的生存率较高芦苇(芦苇澳大利亚人),莎莎德巢有更好的生存率而不是芦苇巢。这些差异在实验结束后消失了。 2013年,位于莎草(Carex SPP)的巢穴比釜水(Typha SPP)或常见的芦苇(芦苇澳大利亚人)的巢有更好的生存率。覆盖巢穴与塑料网,植物在三周的曝光期后,巢穴存活增加高达38%。监测潜在的巢捕食者:通过观察狩猎活动,使用活陷阱和鸟类来监测潜在的巢捕食者:哺乳动物(Mustelids和啮齿动物)。用蜡填充鹌鹑蛋壳允许我们识别沼泽鹞(马戏团铜绿素)作为主要巢捕食者 - 在67%的被剥夺的巢穴中,蜡蛋占据了猛禽喙的痕迹。美国水貂(Neovison Vison)和水田(Arvicola Amhibius)虽然在研究区内丰富,但巢捕食者并不重要,因为只记录了这些哺乳动物的几件斑点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号