首页> 外文期刊>Arctic: Journal of the Arctic Institute of North America >Testing Whether Camera Presence Influences Habitat Specific Predation Pressure on Artificial Shorebird Nests in the Arctic
【24h】

Testing Whether Camera Presence Influences Habitat Specific Predation Pressure on Artificial Shorebird Nests in the Arctic

机译:测试是否相机存在是影响北极人工岸边巢穴的栖息地特定捕食压力

获取原文
           

摘要

When monitoring the breeding ecology of birds, the causes and times of nest failure can be difficult to determine. Cameras placed near nests allow for accurate monitoring of nest fate, but their presence may increase the risk of predation by attracting predators, leading to biased results. The relative influence of cameras on nest predation risk may also depend on habitat because predator numbers or behaviour can change in response to the availability or accessibility of nests. We evaluated the impact of camera presence on the predation rate of artificial nests placed within mesic tundra habitats used by Arctic-breeding shorebirds. We deployed 94 artificial nests, half with cameras and half without, during the shorebird-nesting season of 2015 in the East Bay Migratory Bird Sanctuary, Nunavut. Artificial nests were distributed evenly across sedge meadow and supratidal habitats typically used by nesting shorebirds. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to assess differential nest survival in relation to camera presence, habitat type, placement date, and all potential interactions. Artificial nests with cameras did not experience higher predation risk than those without cameras. Predation risk of artificial nests was related to an interaction between habitat type and placement date. Nests deployed in sedge meadows and in supratidal habitats later in the season were subject to a higher risk of predation than those deployed in supratidal habitats early in the season. These differences in predation risk are likely driven by the foraging behaviour of Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus), a species that accounted for 81% of observed predation events in this study. Arctic fox prey primarily on Arvicoline prey and goose eggs at this site and take shorebird nests opportunistically, perhaps more often later in the season when their preferred prey becomes scarcer. This study demonstrates that, at this site, cameras used for nest monitoring do not influence predation risk. Evaluating the impact of cameras on predation risk is critical prior to their use, as individual study areas may differ in terms of predator species and behaviour.
机译:监测鸟类的育种生态时,巢失效的原因和时间可能很难确定。放置在巢附近的摄像机允许准确地监测巢命运,但它们的存在可能通过吸引捕食者增加捕食者的风险,导致偏见的结果。相机对巢捕食风险的相对影响也可能取决于栖息地,因为捕食者编号或行为可以响应巢的可用性或可访问性而改变。我们评估了摄像机存在对北极苔原栖息地使用的人工巢穴捕食率的影响。我们部署了94名人造巢,一半,一半,没有,没有,在2015年的北湾迁徙鸟类庇护所,Nunavut的Shorebird嵌套季节期间。人造巢均均匀地分布在莎草草甸和通常通过嵌套的鸟鸟类使用的Suprattalal栖息地。我们使用Cox比例危险模型来评估与相机存在,栖息地,安置日期和所有潜在相互作用相关的差异巢生存。具有相机的人造巢穴并没有比没有相机的捕食风险更高。人造巢的捕食风险与栖息地类型和安置日之间的互动有关。巢穴部署在莎草草甸和本赛季后来的Suprattatal栖息地遭受较高的捕食风险,而不是在本赛季早期部署的那些。捕食风险的这些差异可能是北极狐(Lagopus)的觅食行为驱动的,该物种占本研究中观察到的捕食事件的81%。北极狐牺牲于本网站的Arvicoline猎物和鹅蛋,并在他们最喜欢的猎物变得稀缺的季节后来拍摄Shorebird Nests。本研究表明,在本网站上,用于巢监测的摄像机不会影响捕食风险。评估摄像机对捕食风险的影响是在使用之前至关重要,因为个别研究区域可能在捕食者物种和行为方面不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号