首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Quantifying the relative predation pressure on bumblebee nests by the European badger (Meles meles) using artificial nests
【2h】

Quantifying the relative predation pressure on bumblebee nests by the European badger (Meles meles) using artificial nests

机译:欧洲badge使用人工巢来量化大黄蜂巢上的相对捕食压力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bumblebee populations are declining. Factors that impact the size and success of colonies act by either limiting resource availability (bottom‐up regulation) or causing mortality, for example, pesticides, disease, and possibly predation (top‐down regulation). The impact of predation has not been quantified, and so, the current study used novel artificial nests as a proxy for wild bumblebee nests to quantify the relative predation pressure from badgers in two habitats: woodland and grassland, and at two nesting depths: surface and underground. Badgers occur across most parts of the UK and are known to predate on bumblebee nests. We found that significantly more artificial nests (pots containing bumblebee nest material) were dug up compared with control pots (pots without bumblebee nest material). This shows that artificial nests have the potential to be used as a method to study the predation of bumblebee nests by badgers. In a location of high badger density, predation pressure was greater in woodland than grassland, whereas no difference was observed in relation to nest depth. Woodland and grassland are shared habitats between bumblebees and badgers, and we suggest that higher predation may relate to activity and foraging behavior of badgers in woodland compared with grassland. We discuss how badger predation in different habitats could impact different bumblebee species according to their nesting behaviors. Understanding the relative impact of badger predation on bumblebee colonies provides key information on how such top‐down regulation affects bumblebee populations.
机译:大黄蜂的数量正在减少。影响菌落大小和成功的因素是通过限制资源的可利用性(自下而上的调节)或造成死亡(例如杀虫剂,疾病和可能的掠食(自上而下的调节))来实现的。捕食的影响尚未被量化,因此,当前的研究使用新颖的人工巢作为野生大黄蜂巢的替代物,以量化wood在两个栖息地(林地和草地)以及两个筑巢深度(地表和底栖)的rs的相对捕食压力。地下。 most遍布英国大部分地区,并且早于大黄蜂巢。我们发现,与对照盆(不含大黄蜂巢材料的盆)相比,挖出了更多的人工巢(包含大黄蜂巢材料的盆)。这表明人工巢有潜力用作研究badge对大黄蜂巢捕食的方法。在badge密度高的地区,林地中的捕食压力大于草原,而巢深度方面没有发现差异。林地和草原是大黄蜂和badge之间的共同栖息地,我们建议,与草原相比,林地和of的捕食活动可能与wood的活动和觅食行为有关。我们讨论了不同栖息地的r捕食如何根据其筑巢行为影响不同的大黄蜂物种。了解of捕食对大黄蜂群落的相对影响,提供了有关这种自上而下的法规如何影响大黄蜂种群的关键信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号