首页> 外文期刊>Plasma physics and controlled fusion >Disruption prediction investigations using Machine Learning tools on DIII-D and Alcator C-Mod
【24h】

Disruption prediction investigations using Machine Learning tools on DIII-D and Alcator C-Mod

机译:DIII-D和ALCator C-Mod采用机器学习工具的中断预测调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using data-driven methodology, we exploit the time series of relevant plasma parameters for a large set of disrupted and non-disrupted discharges to develop a classification algorithm for detecting disruptive phases in shots that eventually disrupt. Comparing the same methodology on different devices is crucial in order to have information on the portability of the developed algorithm and the possible extrapolation to ITER. Therefore, we use data from two very different tokamaks, DIII-D and Alcator C-Mod. We focus on a subset of disruption predictors, most of which are dimensionless and/or machine-independent parameters, coming from both plasma diagnostics and equilibrium reconstructions, such as the normalized plasma internal inductance and the n = 1 mode amplitude normalized to the toroidal magnetic field. Using such dimensionless indicators facilitates a more direct comparison between DIII-D and C-Mod. We then choose a shallow Machine Learning technique, called Random Forests, to explore the databases available for the two devices. We show results from the classification task, where we introduce a time dependency through the definition of class labels on the basis of the elapsed time before the disruption (i.e. 'far from a disruption' and 'close to a disruption'). The performances of the different Random Forest classifiers are discussed in terms of several metrics, by showing the number of successfully detected samples, as well as the misclassifications. The overall model accuracies are above 97% when identifying a 'far from disruption' and a `disruptive' phase for disrupted discharges. Nevertheless, the Forests are intrinsically different in their capability of predicting a disruptive behavior, with C-Mod predictions comparable to random guesses. Indeed, we show that C-Mod recall index, i.e. the sensitivity to a disruptive behavior, is as low as 0.47, while DIII-D recall is -0.72. The portability of the developed algorithm is also tested across the two devices,
机译:使用数据驱动方法,我们利用了大量中断和非中断放电的相关等离子体参数的时间序列,以开发用于检测最终破坏的截图中的破坏性阶段的分类算法。比较不同设备上相同的方法是至关重要的,以便有关于发达算法的可移植性和可能的​​推断到迭代的信息。因此,我们使用来自两个非常不同的tokamaks,diii-d和Alcator C-Mod的数据。我们专注于中断预测因子的子集,其中大多数是无量纲和/或无关的参数,来自等离子体诊断和平衡重建,例如归一化等离子体内部电感和n = 1模式幅度归一成到环形磁性场地。使用这种无量纲指示器有助于DIII-D和C-MOD之间的更直接比较。然后,我们选择一个浅机器学习技术,称为随机林,探索两个设备可用的数据库。我们展示了分类任务的结果,在那里我们通过在中断前的经过时间的基础上通过类标签的定义来介绍时间依赖(即“远离中断”和“接近中断”)。通过显示成功检测到的样本的数量以及错误分类,根据几个度量来讨论不同随机林分类器的性能。当识别“远离中断”时,整体模型准确性高于97%,并为中断排放的“破坏性”阶段。尽管如此,森林在预测破坏性行为的能力中是内在的不同,C-Mod预测可与随机猜测相当。实际上,我们表明C-Mod召回索引,即对破坏性行为的敏感性低至0.47,而DIII-D召回是-0.72。开发算法的可移植性也在两个设备上进行测试,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号