...
首页> 外文期刊>Agroforestry Systems >APEX model simulation of runoff and sediment losses for grazed pasture watersheds with agroforestry buffers
【24h】

APEX model simulation of runoff and sediment losses for grazed pasture watersheds with agroforestry buffers

机译:农林交错带放牧牧场流域的径流和泥沙流失APEX模型模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Buffers have been found to reduce non-point source pollution (NPSP) from watersheds. Hydrologic simulation models assist in predicting the effects of buffers on runoff and sediment losses from small watersheds. The objective of this study was to calibrate, validate and simulate runoff and sediment losses and compare buffer effects on NPSP losses relative to control watersheds (no buffer) for seven years. The experimental design consists of four watersheds under pasture management which were monitored from 2002 through 2008; two with agroforestry buffers (AgB 100 and AgB 300) and two control watersheds (CW 400 and CW 600). Pasture areas included red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) and lespedeza (Kummerowia stipulacea Maxim.) planted into fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) while the agroforestry buffer area included Eastern cottonwood trees (Populus deltoids Bortr. ex Marsh.) planted into fescue. The APEX model was calibrated from 2002 to 2005 and was validated from 2006 to 2008. The r (2) and NSE values for the calibration and validation periods of the runoff varied from 0.52 to 0.78 and 0.50 to 0.74, respectively. The model did not predict sediment loss very well probably due to insufficient number of measured events and low measured sediment loss. The measured runoff was 57% higher for CW watersheds compared to AgB watersheds. The measured sediment loss was 95% higher for CW watersheds compared to AgB watersheds. After calibrating and validating the model, it was run for long-term scenario analyses for 10 years from 1999 to 2008. Simulated buffer width had a significant influence on runoff. Simulated runoff decreased by 24% when the buffer width was doubled compared to losses associated with the measured buffer width. Simulated runoff from the CW watersheds was 11% higher with double stocking density (relative to measured density) compared to AgB watersheds with double stocking density. With half stocking density (relative to measured density), the AgB watershed had 18% lower runoff compared to CW. Results from this study imply that establishment of agroforestry buffers on grazed pasture watersheds reduce runoff and sediment losses compared to control watersheds without buffers.
机译:已经发现缓冲液可以减少流域的面源污染(NPSP)。水文模拟模型有助于预测缓冲带对小流域径流和沉积物损失的影响。这项研究的目的是校准,验证和模拟径流和沉积物的损失,并比较缓冲液对NPSP损失相对于对照流域(无缓冲液)的影响,为期7年。实验设计包括四个由牧场管理的流域,从2002年至2008年对其进行了监控。两个带有农林业缓冲带(AgB 100和AgB 300)和两个控制流域(CW 400和CW 600)。牧区包括种植在羊茅上的红三叶草(Trifolium pretense L.)和lespedeza(Kummerowia stipulacea Maxim。),而农林业缓冲区包括种植在羊茅上的东部杨木(Populus deltoids Bortr。ex Marsh。)。 APEX模型于2002年至2005年进行了校准,并于2006年至2008年得到了验证。径流的校准和验证期的r(2)和NSE值分别从0.52到0.78和0.50到0.74不等。该模型不能很好地预测泥沙流失,可能是由于实测事件数量不足和测得的泥沙流失率较低。与AgB流域相比,CW流域测得的径流高出57%。与AgB流域相比,CW流域测得的沉积物损失高95%。在对模型进行校准和验证后,将其用于从1999年到2008年的10年的长期情景分析。模拟的缓冲带宽度对径流具有重大影响。当缓冲区宽度增加一倍时,与测量缓冲区宽度相关的损耗相比,模拟的径流减少了24%。与放养密度两倍的AgB流域相比,放养密度两倍(相对于测量密度)的连续水流域的模拟径流高出11%。放养密度为一半(相对于测得的密度),与连续水相比,AgB流域的径流降低了18%。这项研究的结果表明,与没有缓冲带的对照流域相比,在放牧的牧场流域上建立农林业缓冲带可减少径流和沉积物损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号