首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >INFLUENCE OF SUMMER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF GRAZED WHEAT PASTURES ON RUNOFF, SEDIMENT, AND NUTRIENT LOSSES
【24h】

INFLUENCE OF SUMMER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF GRAZED WHEAT PASTURES ON RUNOFF, SEDIMENT, AND NUTRIENT LOSSES

机译:放牧小麦夏季管理措施对径流,沉积物和养分流失的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The agricultural economy of the southern Great Plains relies on practices that incorporate grazed winter wheat and associated summer management practices. Information exists about the impact of these practices on water quality, but data related to runoff and associated nutrient and sediment movement due to high intensity, late summer storms in the southern Great Plains are limited. This study examined runoff and runoff water quality from two winter wheat management strategies: winter wheat with summer chemical fallow (WWF) and winter wheat with summer legumes (WWSL) and two grazing treatments (grazed and ungrazed) from 1998 to 2002. Four pastures were planted in conservation winter wheat and grazed from November to May. Summer legumes were direct seeded in two of the pastures in March and grazed mid-July to September. Runoff from plots (1.5 × 3m) was quantified with a rainfall simulator, with rainfall intensities representing a late summer, short duration (15 min), high intensity (10 cm/h) summer storm. Runoff samples were analyzed for nitrate-N (NO{sub}3-N), bioavailable and water-soluble phosphorus (BAP and WSP, respectively), and sediment yield. Overall, the WWF practice had greater runoff, sediment, and nutrient losses than the WWSL strategy. Likewise, grazing produced greater runoff, sediment, and nutrient losses than ungrazed plots. The worst-case scenario was WWF pastures that incorporated winter grazing, with 71% of applied rainfall lost as runoff. The greatest losses for sediment (284 kg/ha), NO{sub}3-N (124 kg/ha), BAP (380 g/ha), and WSP (38 g/ha) were found with the grazed WWF practice. Understanding the mechanism of interaction between late summer storms and summer management practices will improve large-scale mitigation strategies to reduce erosion and enhance capture of water resources.
机译:大平原南部的农业经济依赖于结合了冬小麦和夏季管理实践的实践。有关这些做法对水质的影响的信息已经存在,但是与大径流,大强度平原南部夏季暴风雨引起的径流以及相关的养分和泥沙运动有关的数据有限。这项研究从1998年至2002年的两种冬小麦管理策略:带有夏季化学休耕(WWF)的冬小麦和带有夏季豆科植物(WWSL)的冬小麦以及两种放牧处理方法(去草和未去草)处理了径流和径流水质。在保护性冬小麦中种植,11月至5月放牧。夏季豆科植物在3月的两个牧场中直接播种,7月中旬至9月放牧。用降雨模拟器对样地的径流(1.5×3m)进行了量化,降雨强度代表了夏末,短时(15分钟),高强度(10 cm / h)的夏季风暴。分析了径流样品的硝酸盐-N(NO {sub} 3-N),生物有效性和水溶性磷(分别为BAP和WSP)和沉积物产量。总体而言,与WWSL战略相比,WWF的做法具有更大的径流,泥沙和营养损失。同样,放牧比未耕作的土地产生更大的径流,沉积物和养分流失。最坏的情况是WWF牧场结合了冬季放牧,其中71%的降雨流失是径流。 WWF放牧实践发现,沉积物(284 kg / ha),NO {sub} 3-N(124 kg / ha),BAP(380 g / ha)和WSP(38 g / ha)的损失最大。了解夏末暴风雨与夏季管理实践之间相互作用的机制将改善大规模的减灾策略,以减少侵蚀并增强对水资源的获取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号