Abstract Reinterpretation of dinosaur footprints from the Lower Cretaceous of Huanglonggou, Zhucheng, Shandong Province, China: Comment on “Tracking the yellow dragons: Implications of China’s largest dinosaur tracksite (Cretaceous of the Zhucheng area, Shandong Province, China)” by Lockley et al. (2015)
首页> 外文期刊>Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology: An International Journal for the Geo-Sciences >Reinterpretation of dinosaur footprints from the Lower Cretaceous of Huanglonggou, Zhucheng, Shandong Province, China: Comment on “Tracking the yellow dragons: Implications of China’s largest dinosaur tracksite (Cretaceous of the Zhucheng area, Shandong Province, China)” by Lockley et al. (2015)
【24h】

Reinterpretation of dinosaur footprints from the Lower Cretaceous of Huanglonggou, Zhucheng, Shandong Province, China: Comment on “Tracking the yellow dragons: Implications of China’s largest dinosaur tracksite (Cretaceous of the Zhucheng area, Shandong Province, China)” by Lockley et al. (2015)

机译:从山东省朱城,中国朱城的下白垩纪重新解释恐龙脚印:评论“跟踪黄龙:中国最大的恐龙田径史(山东省,山东省,中国)的含义”的影响。 (2015)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AbstractZhucheng, located in eastern Shandong Province, China, is well-known for its abundant Early Cretaceous dinosaur footprints and Late Cretaceous dinosaur bone fossils. Recently, Lockley et al. (2015) presented a sketch study on the Huanglonggou tracksite in the Zhucheng area, and critically commented on our paper (H. Xu et al., 2013), which conducted a detailed and comprehensive study of the tracksite. Here, we demonstrate that some of their assumptions and comments on our work are subjective and incorrect. Tracks at the Huanglonggou tracksite, including a dominant theropod (large theropod,Grallator yangi/Paragrallator,Corpulentapus lilasia), and subordinate sauropod, suspected ornithopod, and turtle tracks were preserved in the Yangjiazhuang Formation with estimated ages of 129 to 122Ma, rather than in the Longwangzhuang Formation as proposed by Lockley and his associates. Contrary to Lockley et al. (2015), our mapping of the Huanglonggou tracksite exhibits the previous work by Li et al. (2011) and focuses on the 50 well-preserved trackways and their orientations. Based on the stride length to footprint size index diagram and the Grallator–Anchisauripus–Eubrontes (GAE) plexus, our statistical constraints on the three species of theropods are better than those of Lockley et al. (2015). Lockley argued that tracks at the site were preserved on at least five levels, of which the majority on level 4 were of excellent preservation. In fact, the tracks identified throughout the site have been from only one level. The false appearance of multiple levels is interpreted as the result of sedimentation at the shoreline and di
机译:<![cdata [ Abstract zhucheng,位于中国东部的中国东部,为其丰富的早期白垩纪恐龙脚印和晚餐恐龙骨化石众所周知。最近,洛克利等。 (2015)介绍了朱城地区黄龙沟田径场的素描研究,对我们的论文(H.Xu et al。,2013)进行了批判性评论,这对Tracksite进行了详细和全面的研究。在这里,我们证明他们对我们工作的一些假设和评论是主观的和不正确的。在黄龙沟田径场轨道,包括占主导地位的Theropod(大型Theropod,格拉特yangi / 保释员 corpulentapus lilasia ),涉嫌武器索多普德,疑似武装池和龟轨,在杨家庄形成,估计年龄129至122mA,而不是洛克利和他的员工提出的龙王庄形成。与洛克利等人相反。 (2015),我们对黄龙沟田径技术的映射展示了李等人的前一项工作。 (2011)并侧重于50道保存完好的轨道和定向。基于足迹尺寸指标图和格拉特 - 锚杆鹦鹉(GAE)丛(GAE)Plexus的跨度长度,我们对三种Theropods的统计约束优于Lockley等人。 (2015)。洛克利认为,该网站的轨道在至少五个层面被保存,其中大多数人在4级具有优秀的保存。实际上,整个网站中识别的曲目已从一个级别中达到。由于海岸线和迪的沉降结果,多个级别的错误外观被解释为沉降

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号