...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant disease management reports PDMR >Efficacy of fungicides for management of blueberry rust, Appling County, Georgia, 2016
【24h】

Efficacy of fungicides for management of blueberry rust, Appling County, Georgia, 2016

机译:杀菌剂对蓝莓锈,苹果县,佐治亚州,2016的疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Fungicides were evaluated for control of blueberry rust in a replicated trial within a single row of mature (10-yr-old) highbush blueberries (cv. Rebel) in a commercial field near Baxley, GA. Of particular interest were the relative levels of controlamong the four demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides and one premix containing a DMI fungicide. Treatments were assigned using a randomized complete block design consisting of with five single-bush replicates per treatment; adjacent buffer rows and asingle bush on either side of treatments were left unsprayed to prevent spray drift. It should be noted that a significant proportion of blueberry bushes at this site were also affected by blueberry leaf scorch but care was taken to avoid inclusion of severely affected bushes in experimental blocks. Treatments were applied until run-off with approximately 0.5 gal applied per five bushes (equivalent to 100 gal water/A) using a CO2 backpack sprayer fitted with a cone nozzle at 40 psi. Treatments includedan untreated control, Abound (azoxystrobin), Pristine (pyraclostrobin + boscalid), Indar (fenbuconazole), Orbit (propiconazole), Proline (prothioconazole), Quash (metconazole), Aprovia (benzovindiflupyr), Quilt Xcel (azoxystrobin + propiconazole), and asplit schedule application of Abound until harvest followed by Bravo (chlorothalonil) until trial termination. Application dates were 4 Apr, 18 Apr, 2 May (last spray prior to harvest), 16 May, 30 May, and 13 Jun. On each of four assessment dates (30 Mar, 21 Apr, 2 Jun, 15 Jun), 50 leaves per bush were destructively sampled and assessed for blueberry rust with severity calculated as % affected leaf area and incidence as the proportion of infected leaves. The area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC)was calculated using the formula AUDPC = 2~]f=i[{(Xi + ^(i+i))/2) x (t(i+1) - t;)], where Yj= disease severity or incidence at tt and t(i+1) - tt = the number or days between disease assessments. PROC GLIMMIX (Generalized Linear Mixed Model) within thestatistical software SAS 9.4 was used to analyze the data.
机译:在一排成熟(10岁)高杂蓝莓(CV.Rebel)附近的商业领域,评估了在复制的试验中对蓝莓生锈进行评估进行杀菌剂。特别令人兴趣的是Scuppamong四个去甲基化抑制剂(DMI)杀菌剂的相对水平和含有DMI杀真菌剂的一个预混物。使用随机的完整块设计分配治疗,该设计由每次治疗五个单灌木复制组成;处理处理两侧的相邻缓冲行和asingle衬套被留下,以防止喷雾漂移。应当注意,该网站上的大量蓝莓灌木也受到蓝莓叶烧焦的影响,但注意避免在实验块中包含严重影响的灌木丛。施加处理直至每五个衬套(相当于100加仑水/ a)施加约0.5加仑的径流,使用在40psi下配有锥形喷嘴的CO 2背包喷雾器。治疗方法未经处理的控制,比比皆是(氮杂毒素+ Boscalid),indar(Fenbuconazole),orbit(丙酰唑),脯氨酸(普氏阳氨酰唑),quash(metcocazole),aprovia(benzovindiflupyr),被子xcel(氮杂毒素+ propiconazole),和ASPlit计划应用比比,直到收获,然后是Bravo(氯洛尼尼尔)直到试验终止。申请日期为4月4日,5月1日(收获前的最后一次喷雾),5月30日,5月30日和13日。在四个评估日期中的每一个(3月30日,2月21日,15月21日,15月21日),50每个灌木的叶子被破坏性地抽样并评估蓝莓生锈,严重程度计算为%受影响的叶面积和发病率作为感染叶的比例。使用公式audpc = 2〜] f = i [{(xi + ^(i + i))/ 2)x(t(i + 1) - t;)计算疾病进度曲线(audpc)的区域。 ],其中YJ =疾病严重程度或TT和T(I + 1)的发病率 - TT =疾病评估之间的数量或天。在统计软件SAS 9.4中,将Proc Glimmix(广义线性混合模型)用于分析数据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Plant disease management reports PDMR》 |2017年第2017期|共1页
  • 作者单位

    Dept. of Plant Pathology University of Georgia Athens GA 30602;

    Dept. of Plant Pathology University of Georgia Athens GA 30602;

    Bacon County Cooperative Extension Service Alma GA 31510;

    Appling County Cooperative Extension Service Baxley GA 31513;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 植物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号