...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical review, E >Effects of phase lag on the hovering flight of damselfly and dragonfly
【24h】

Effects of phase lag on the hovering flight of damselfly and dragonfly

机译:阶段滞后对蜻蜓和蜻蜓徘徊的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this work we studied the differences in flight kinematics and aerodynamics that could relate to differences in wing morphologies of a dragonfly and a damselfly. The damselflies and dragonflies normally fly with the fore wing or hind wing in the lead, respectively. The wing of the damselfly is petiolate, which means that the wing root is narrower than that of the dragonfly. The influence of the biological morphology between the damselfly and the dragonfly on their hovering strategies is worthy of clarification. The flight motions of damselflies and dragonflies in hovering were recorded with two high-speed cameras; we analyzed the differences between their hovering motions using computational fluid dynamics. The distinct mechanisms of the hovering flight of damselflies (Matrona cyanoptera) and dragonflies (Neurothemis ramburii) with different phase lags between fore and hind wings were deduced. The results of a comparison of the differences of wing phases in hovering showed that the rotational effect has an important role in the aerodynamics; the interactions between fore and hind wings greatly affect their vortex structure and flight performance. The wake of a damselfly sheds smoothly because of slender petiolation; a vertical force is generated steadily during the stage of wing translation. Damselflies hover with a longer translational phase and a larger flapping amplitude. In contrast, the root vortex of a dragonfly impedes the shedding of wake vortices in the upstroke, which results in the loss of a vertical force; the dragonfly hence hovers with a large amplitude of wing rotation. These species of Odonata insects developed varied hovering strategies to fit their distinct biological morphologies.
机译:在这项工作中,我们研究了飞行运动学和空气动力学的差异,可能与蜻蜓的翼形态和蜻蜓有关。蜻蜓和蜻蜓通常分别在铅中与前翼或后翼飞行。叶片的翅膀是叶柄,这意味着机翼根部比蜻蜓窄。生物形态学与蜻蜓之间的生物形态对他们的徘徊策略的影响值得澄清。用两个高速相机记录蜻蜓和蜻蜓的飞行动作;我们使用计算流体动力学分析了它们悬停动作之间的差异。 Depselflies(Matrona Cyanoptera)和蜻蜓(神经管Ramburii)的不同机制被推导出在前后和后翅之间的不同相滞后。悬停中翼序差异的比较结果表明,旋转效应在空气动力学中具有重要作用;前翼与后翼之间的相互作用极大地影响了它们的涡旋结构和飞行性能。由于细长的石灰化而平稳地缩小了叶片的唤醒;在翼翻译阶段期间稳定地产生垂直力。 Damsemlies悬停较长的平移相和较大的拍打幅度。相比之下,蜻蜓的根漩涡阻碍了在上行程中的尾部涡旋的脱落,这导致垂直力的损失;蜻蜓因此徘徊在大振幅的翼形旋转。这些odonata昆虫的种类开发了不同的悬停策略,以适应他们独特的生物形态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号